These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1387120)
1. Where is the sure interpreter? Capron AM Hastings Cent Rep; 1992; 22(4):26-7. PubMed ID: 1387120 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. When others must choose: deciding for patients without capacity. The New York State Task Force on Life and the Law. Daly RW HEC Forum; 1993 Mar; 5(2):100-7. PubMed ID: 10125155 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. New York rule compounds dilemma over life support. Belkin L N Y Times Web; 1992 May; ():A1, B4. PubMed ID: 11646928 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. In re Smerdon. Kraayeveld J Issues Law Med; 1991; 7(3):359-61. PubMed ID: 1765455 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Doctors, families and difficult decisions: the implications of the Lawrance case. Nocon JJ Indiana Med; 1991 Nov; 84(11):808-10. PubMed ID: 1761855 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Mentally incapacitated adults and decision-making: the English perspective. Hale B Int J Law Psychiatry; 1997; 20(1):59-75. PubMed ID: 9130015 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Treatment decisions for patients without surrogates: rethinking policies for a vulnerable population. Miller TE; Coleman CH; Cugliari AM J Am Geriatr Soc; 1997 Mar; 45(3):369-74. PubMed ID: 9063286 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A judge's perspective: the New York rulings. Wachtler S Law Med Health Care; 1991; 19(1-2):60-2. PubMed ID: 1895766 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Helga Wanglie revisited: medical futility and the limits of autonomy. Johnson DH Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 8293205 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The right of the elderly to self-determination and New York's legislative imperative. Tomlinson AK Pace Law Rev; 1988; 8(1):63-113. PubMed ID: 11650172 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Foregoing life-sustaining treatment for adult, developmentally disabled, public wards: a proposed statute. McKnight DK; Bellis M Am J Law Med; 1992; 18(3):203-32. PubMed ID: 1283812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mental incapacity: some proposals for legislative reform. McHale JV J Med Ethics; 1998 Oct; 24(5):322-7. PubMed ID: 9800588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cruzan and its impact on patient self-determination. Gilbert LJ J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(1):111-33. PubMed ID: 11659441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Withholding life support treatment in Illinois--Part I. Hodgman DR; Frazer QR Ill Bar J; 1984 Oct; 73(2):106-11. PubMed ID: 11658588 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Death in the legislature: inventing legal tools for autonomy. Sabatino CP Rev Law Soc Change; 1991-1992; 19(2):309-39. PubMed ID: 11652237 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. New law proposed for treating mentally incapacitated people. Dyer C BMJ; 1993 May; 306(6887):1226. PubMed ID: 11643132 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Listening to the disabled: end-of-life medical decision making and the never competent. Miller EC Fordham Law Rev; 2006 Apr; 74(5):2889-925. PubMed ID: 17115482 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Withholding food and water from a patient--should it be condoned in California? Harber SM Pac Law J; 1985 Apr; 16(3):877-93. PubMed ID: 11652432 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. No-code orders vs. resuscitation: the decision to withhold life-prolonging treatment from the terminally ill. Allan SM Wayne Law Rev; 1979 Nov; 26(1):139-72. PubMed ID: 11661826 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Indiana's new health care consent act: a guiding light for the health care provider. Thompson WH Indiana Law Rev; 1988; 21(1):181-203. PubMed ID: 11659030 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]