These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1388359)

  • 1. Review articles and publication bias.
    Kleijnen J; Knipschild P
    Arzneimittelforschung; 1992 May; 42(5):587-91. PubMed ID: 1388359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Searching for unpublished trials in Cochrane reviews may not be worth the effort.
    van Driel ML; De Sutter A; De Maeseneer J; Christiaens T
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):838-844.e3. PubMed ID: 19128939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating the proportion of studies missing for meta-analysis due to publication bias.
    Formann AK
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Sep; 29(5):732-9. PubMed ID: 18586577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. N-acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: publication bias perpetuated by meta-analyses.
    Vaitkus PT; Brar C
    Am Heart J; 2007 Feb; 153(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 17239689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence of publication bias in reporting acute stroke clinical trials.
    Liebeskind DS; Kidwell CS; Sayre JW; Saver JL
    Neurology; 2006 Sep; 67(6):973-9. PubMed ID: 17000963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An international survey indicated that unpublished systematic reviews exist.
    Tricco AC; Pham B; Brehaut J; Tetroe J; Cappelli M; Hopewell S; Lavis JN; Berlin JA; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jun; 62(6):617-623.e5. PubMed ID: 19162440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality control in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Bown MJ; Sutton AJ
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2010 Nov; 40(5):669-77. PubMed ID: 20732826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reducing publication bias through trial registration.
    Abaid LN; Grimes DA; Schulz KF
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 109(6):1434-7. PubMed ID: 17540818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating a summarized odds ratio whilst eliminating publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Sugita M; Kanamori M; Izuno T; Miyakawa M
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 1992 Oct; 22(5):354-8. PubMed ID: 1469797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. NIH clinical trials and publication bias.
    Dickersin K; Min YI
    Online J Curr Clin Trials; 1993 Apr; Doc No 50():[4967 words; 53 paragraphs]. PubMed ID: 8306005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Publication bias in medical informatics evaluation research: is it an issue or not?
    Machan C; Ammenwerth E; Bodner T
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 124():957-62. PubMed ID: 17108634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Duplicate publication a way of embellishing research results. Unethical misuse which threatens the validity of systematic reviews and meta-analysis].
    Eliasson M
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Aug; 97(32-33):3454-6. PubMed ID: 11037585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
    Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Laupland K; Manns B; Doig C
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 17205029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Association of industry sponsorship to published outcomes in gastrointestinal clinical research.
    Brown A; Kraft D; Schmitz SM; Sharpless V; Martin C; Shah R; Shaheen NJ
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2006 Dec; 4(12):1445-51. PubMed ID: 17101295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in 'meta-epidemiological' research.
    Sterne JA; Jüni P; Schulz KF; Altman DG; Bartlett C; Egger M
    Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(11):1513-24. PubMed ID: 12111917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are studies reporting significant results more likely to be published?
    Koletsi D; Karagianni A; Pandis N; Makou M; Polychronopoulou A; Eliades T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):632.e1-5; discussion 632-3. PubMed ID: 19892276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Capture-recapture is a potentially useful method for assessing publication bias.
    Bennett DA; Latham NK; Stretton C; Anderson CS
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Apr; 57(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 15135835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Empirical evaluation showed that the Copas selection model provided a useful summary in 80% of meta-analyses.
    Carpenter JR; Schwarzer G; Rücker G; Künstler R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jun; 62(6):624-631.e4. PubMed ID: 19282148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tackling publication bias and selective reporting in health informatics research: register your eHealth trials in the International eHealth Studies Registry.
    Eysenbach G
    J Med Internet Res; 2004 Sep; 6(3):e35. PubMed ID: 15471761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.