89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1389271)
1. The Intact porcine bioprosthesis: early world-wide clinical experience and analysis of a single institution's experience.
Vermeulen F; Bennink G; Ernst S; Jaarsma W; Chevalier PA; Lutz DV
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1992; 6 Suppl 1():S124-7. PubMed ID: 1389271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Twenty-year clinical experience with porcine bioprostheses.
Fann JI; Miller DC; Moore KA; Mitchell RS; Oyer PE; Stinson EB; Robbins RC; Reitz BA; Shumway NE
Ann Thorac Surg; 1996 Nov; 62(5):1301-11; discussion 1311-2. PubMed ID: 8893561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fifteen years follow up with the St. Jude Medical Biocor porcine bioprosthesis.
Mykén P; Bech-Hanssen O; Phipps B; Caidahl K
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):415-22. PubMed ID: 10888100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Porcine versus pericardial bioprostheses: eleven-year follow up of a prospective randomized trial.
Chaudhry MA; Raco L; Muriithi EW; Bernacca GM; Tolland MM; Wheatley DJ
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):429-37; discussion 437-8. PubMed ID: 10888102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprostheses: clinical performance assessed by actual analysis.
Jamieson WR; Miyagishima RT; Burr LH; Lichtenstein SV; Fradet GJ; Janusz MT
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Jul; 9(4):530-5. PubMed ID: 10947046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Eighteen-year follow up after Hancock II bioprosthesis insertion.
Legarra JJ; Llorens R; Catalan M; Segura I; Trenor AM; de Buruaga JS; Rabago G; Sarralde A
J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 10096477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Five-year evaluation of the Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis.
Jamieson WR; Pelletier LC; Janusz MT; Chaitman BR; Tyers FO; Miyagishima RT
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Sep; 88(3):324-33. PubMed ID: 6381888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Seventeen-year experience with the St. Jude medical biocor porcine bioprosthesis.
Mykén PS
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):486-92. PubMed ID: 16116875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients.
Kulik A; Bédard P; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Masters RG; Mesana TG; Ruel M
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 30(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 16857373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized, prospective assessment of bioprosthetic valve durability. Hancock versus Carpentier-Edwards valves.
Sarris GE; Robbins RC; Miller DC; Mitchell RS; Moore KA; Stinson EB; Oyer PE; Reitz BA; Shumway NE
Circulation; 1993 Nov; 88(5 Pt 2):II55-64. PubMed ID: 8222197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Medtronic Intact porcine bioprosthesis: clinical performance to eight years.
Munro AI; Jamieson WR; Tyers GF; Burr LH
J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Nov; 3(6):634-40. PubMed ID: 8000606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical durability of the Hancock porcine bioprosthetic valve.
Oyer PE; Miller DC; Stinson EB; Reitz BA; Moreno-Cabral RJ; Shumway NE
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1980 Dec; 80(6):824-33. PubMed ID: 7431981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.
Ruel M; Kulik A; Rubens FD; Bédard P; Masters RG; Pipe AL; Mesana TG
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Medtronic mosaic porcine bioprosthesis: investigational center experience to six years.
Jamieson WR; Fradet GJ; MacNab JS; Burr LH; Stanford EA; Janusz MT; Abel JG; Germann E; Cheung A
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jan; 14(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 15700437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Medtronic Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis: assessment of 12-year performance.
Jamieson WR; Riess FC; Raudkivi PJ; Metras J; Busse EF; Goldstein J; Fradet GJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2011 Aug; 142(2):302-7.e2. PubMed ID: 21277591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Influence of the valve position on the complications related to pericardial Carpentier-Edwards valve after 8 years].
Aupart M; Dreyfus X; Meurisse Y; May MA; Sirinelli A; Marchand M
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1995 Jul; 88(7):967-71. PubMed ID: 7487327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis. Comparison of early clinical performance in aortic and mitral positions.
Jamieson WR; Pelletier LC; Gerein AN; Pomar J
Can J Surg; 1992 Apr; 35(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 1562925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical evaluation of the carbomedics prosthesis: experience at providence health system in Portland.
Minakata K; Wu Y; Zerr KJ; Grunkemeier GL; Handy JR; Ahmad A; Starr A; Furnary AP
J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Nov; 11(6):844-50. PubMed ID: 12479287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Actuarial versus actual freedom from structural valve deterioration with the Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprostheses.
Jamieson WR; Burr LH; Miyagishima RT; Germann E; Anderson WN
Can J Cardiol; 1999 Sep; 15(9):973-8. PubMed ID: 10504178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Aortic and mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: 10-year results.
Murakami T; Eishi K; Nakano S; Kobayashi J; Sasako Y; Isobe F; Kosakai Y; Kito Y; Kawashima Y
J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Jan; 5(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 8834725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
