117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1389279)
1. The first step to understanding valve failure: an overview of pathology.
Schoen FJ
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1992; 6 Suppl 1():S50-3. PubMed ID: 1389279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bioprostheses are superior to mechanical prostheses.
Jamieson WR
Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():258-71. PubMed ID: 3727698
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Bioprostheses for cardiac valve replacement.
Jamieson WR
Can J Surg; 1985 Nov; 28(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 4063890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Long-term follow-up of aortic or mitral valve replacement. Comparison of results following implantation of a mechanical or biological artificial valve].
Mudra H; Rudolph W
Herz; 1986 Apr; 11(2):97-115. PubMed ID: 3699678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Results of reoperation for primary tissue failure of porcine bioprostheses.
Bortolotti U; Milano A; Mazzucco A; Valfré C; Talenti E; Guerra F; Thiene G; Gallucci V
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Oct; 90(4):564-9. PubMed ID: 4046622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computer modelling of bioprosthetic heart valves.
Christie GW
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1992; 6 Suppl 1():S95-100; discussion S101. PubMed ID: 1389288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The special problems of the patient with a valvular prosthesis.
Frankl WS
Cardiovasc Clin; 1986; 16(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 3742533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative analysis of mechanical and bioprosthetic valves after aortic valve replacement.
Borkon AM; Soule LM; Baughman KL; Aoun H; Baumgartner WA; Gardner TJ; Watkins L; Gott VL; Reitz BA
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Jul; 94(1):20-33. PubMed ID: 3600005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Are bioprostheses superior to mechanical valves?
Schön HR; Unger B; Weingartner F; Sebening H; Blömer H
Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():286-8. PubMed ID: 3727703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bioprosthetic heart valve failure: pathology and pathogenesis.
Schoen FJ; Levy RJ
Cardiol Clin; 1984 Nov; 2(4):717-39. PubMed ID: 6400011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Carpentier-Edwards supraannular porcine bioprosthesis. A new generation tissue valve with excellent intermediate clinical performance.
Jamieson WR; Munro AI; Miyagishima RT; Burr LH; Gerein AN; Janusz MT; Tyers GF; Allen P
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1988 Oct; 96(4):652-66. PubMed ID: 3172812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pathology of the Pericarbon bovine pericardial xenograft implanted in humans.
Valente M; Ius P; Bortolotti U; Talenti E; Bottio T; Thiene G
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Mar; 7(2):180-9. PubMed ID: 9587859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does pericardial thickness guarantee a homogeneous bioprosthetic product? Evaluation of modification in the physical characteristics of bovine pericardium exposed to pressure stress test.
Mikus PM; Arpesella G; Gargiulo G; Cirillo M; Marrozzini C; Pierangeli V; Pierangeli A
Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():237-40. PubMed ID: 3727692
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative in vitro evaluation of porcine and pericardial bioprostheses.
Reul H; Giersiepen M; Schindehütte H; Effert S; Rau G
Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():223-31. PubMed ID: 3727690
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Haemodynamic evaluation of the Hancock bovine pericardial heart valve.
Weingartner J; Kreuzer E; Weinhold C; Reichart B; Peters D; Erdmann E
Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():241-4. PubMed ID: 3727694
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients.
Kulik A; Bédard P; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Masters RG; Mesana TG; Ruel M
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 30(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 16857373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cardiac valve replacement: a bioengineering approach.
Korossis SA; Fisher J; Ingham E
Biomed Mater Eng; 2000; 10(2):83-124. PubMed ID: 11086842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Paravalvular leaks around prosthetic valves implanted in the mitral position: technical refinements of the ovine model.
Linden BC; Schumacher CW; MacIver RH; Mrachek JP; Bianco RW
J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 May; 12(3):400-5. PubMed ID: 12803342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Original expectations of the Hancock valve and 20 years of clinical reality.
Bortolotti U; Milano A; Thiene G; Mazzucco A
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1992; 6 Suppl 1():S75-8. PubMed ID: 1389284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biological versus mechanical valves. Analysis of 1,116 valves inserted in 1,012 adult patients with a 4,818 patient-year and a 5,327 valve-year follow-up.
Hammond GL; Geha AS; Kopf GS; Hashim SW
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Feb; 93(2):182-98. PubMed ID: 3807394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
