These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13892830)
1. [A new method for microscopic counting of bacteria in a chamber]. FIKHMAN BA Lab Delo; 1962 Feb; 8():55-6. PubMed ID: 13892830 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Rapid counting of bacteria isolated from cattle, swine and sheep carcasses using the resazurin method]. Labadie J; Doumbia M Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B; 1984 Jun; 179(3):217-24. PubMed ID: 6382877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [New variant of the method for direct count of bacteria in water]. Iagodka SN Mikrobiologiia; 1975; 44(1):169-71. PubMed ID: 1099406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A method for counting acid-fast bacteria. Shepard CC; McRae DH Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis; 1968; 36(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 4869698 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Bacteriological study of the small intestine with bacteria counting by means of protected jejunal intubation]. Levrat M; Pasquier J; Truchot R; Moulinier B; Moulin A Arch Fr Mal App Dig; 1968 Oct; 57(10):838-40. PubMed ID: 4921932 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Bacteriological study of the intraocular fluid at the end of cataract surgery]. Feys J; Emond JP; Salvanet-Bouccara A; Dublanchet A J Fr Ophtalmol; 1993; 16(10):501-5. PubMed ID: 8301003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Acridine orange-epifluorescence technique for counting bacteria in natural waters. Francisco DE; Mah RA; Rabin AC Trans Am Microsc Soc; 1973 Jul; 92(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 4581469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of two techniques for counting cellulolytic rumen bacteria. van Gylswyk NO J Gen Microbiol; 1970 Feb; 60(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 4922669 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [The effect of the method of pretreating soil on microbiological analysis in the quantitative counting of bacteria]. Zviagintsev DG; Dmitriev EA; Galkina GM Mikrobiologiia; 1966; 35(2):328-36. PubMed ID: 4896503 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Determination of coliform bacteria in bile and catheter-drawn urine, with a paper-strip rapid method and with the usual bacteriological methods]. GERNER G; HENNING N Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1956 Oct; 81(42):1669-71. PubMed ID: 13375265 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A simple and safe volumetric alternative to the method of Miles, Misra and Irwin for counting viable bacteria. Slack MP; Wheldon DB J Med Microbiol; 1978 Nov; 11(4):541-5. PubMed ID: 364070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A rapid microdilution technique for counting viable bacteria in food. Kramer J Lab Pract; 1977 Sep; 26(9):675-6. PubMed ID: 340779 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Use of the 8BPI-OS chamber for isolation of obligate anaerobic bacteria]. Petrakov AA Lab Delo; 1980; (8):462-4. PubMed ID: 6157894 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Electron microscopic observation of bacteria growing on the skin surface. Montes LF; Owens DW; Knox JM Experientia; 1964 Dec; 20(12):672-3. PubMed ID: 5323536 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Method for the separate counting of yeasts and bacteria cultured together]. Isakova DM; Todosiĭchuk SR Mikrobiol Zh; 1973; 35(5):645-6. PubMed ID: 4593368 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]