These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1389284)
21. The porcine bioprosthesis. A review of 1,000 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac valve replacement. Hatcher CR; Craver JM; Jones EL; Bone DK; Guyton RA Am Surg; 1983 Jan; 49(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 6600591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Biological versus mechanical valves. Analysis of 1,116 valves inserted in 1,012 adult patients with a 4,818 patient-year and a 5,327 valve-year follow-up. Hammond GL; Geha AS; Kopf GS; Hashim SW J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Feb; 93(2):182-98. PubMed ID: 3807394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of Hancock I and Hancock II bioprostheses. Oury JH; Angell WW; Koziol JA J Card Surg; 1988 Sep; 3(3 Suppl):375-81. PubMed ID: 2980040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Seven-year results with the St Jude Medical Silzone mechanical prosthesis. Jamieson WR; Fradet GJ; Abel JG; Janusz MT; Lichtenstein SV; MacNab JS; Stanford EA; Chan F J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 May; 137(5):1109-15.e2. PubMed ID: 19379975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The Carpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis. A first-generation tissue valve with excellent long-term clinical performance. Jamieson WR; Allen P; Miyagishima RT; Gerein AN; Munro AI; Burr LH; Tyers GF J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1990 Mar; 99(3):543-61. PubMed ID: 2308373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Late results of heart valve replacement with the Hancock II bioprosthesis. David TE; Ivanov J; Armstrong S; Feindel CM; Cohen G J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Feb; 121(2):268-77. PubMed ID: 11174732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Age as a determinant for selection of porcine bioprostheses for cardiac valve replacement: experience with Carpentier-Edwards standard bioprosthesis. Jamieson WR; Tyers GF; Janusz MT; Miyagishima RT; Munro AI; Ling H; Burr LH; Tutassaura H Can J Cardiol; 1991 May; 7(4):181-8. PubMed ID: 2070287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Fifteen years follow up with the St. Jude Medical Biocor porcine bioprosthesis. Mykén P; Bech-Hanssen O; Phipps B; Caidahl K J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):415-22. PubMed ID: 10888100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Haemodynamic evaluation of the Hancock bovine pericardial heart valve. Weingartner J; Kreuzer E; Weinhold C; Reichart B; Peters D; Erdmann E Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():241-4. PubMed ID: 3727694 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The zero pressure fixed medtronic intact porcine valve: an 8.5 year review. Barratt-Boyes BG; Jaffe WM; Ko PH; Whitlock RM J Heart Valve Dis; 1993 Sep; 2(5):604-11. PubMed ID: 8269174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Five- to eight-year follow-up of patients with the Hancock cardiac bioprosthesis. Gallo I; Ruiz B; Duran CM J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1983 Dec; 86(6):897-902. PubMed ID: 6645592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A new porcine bioprosthesis: design rationale and early clinical experience. Lemieux M; Dumesnil JG; Dowd C; Lutz D; Cartier P; Desaulniers D; Despres JP; Metras J; Raymond G Can J Cardiol; 1988 Sep; 4(6):322-7. PubMed ID: 3179795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Long-term follow-up of aortic or mitral valve replacement. Comparison of results following implantation of a mechanical or biological artificial valve]. Mudra H; Rudolph W Herz; 1986 Apr; 11(2):97-115. PubMed ID: 3699678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The first step to understanding valve failure: an overview of pathology. Schoen FJ Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1992; 6 Suppl 1():S50-3. PubMed ID: 1389279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]