BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1389288)

  • 1. Computer modelling of bioprosthetic heart valves.
    Christie GW
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1992; 6 Suppl 1():S95-100; discussion S101. PubMed ID: 1389288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. St Jude Epic heart valve bioprostheses versus native human and porcine aortic valves - comparison of mechanical properties.
    Kalejs M; Stradins P; Lacis R; Ozolanta I; Pavars J; Kasyanov V
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 May; 8(5):553-6. PubMed ID: 19190025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The stentless bioprosthesis: surgical challenges and implications for long-term durability.
    Barratt-Boyes BG; Christie GW; Raudkivi PJ
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1992; 6 Suppl 1():S39-42; discussion S43. PubMed ID: 1389277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Functional analysis of bioprosthetic heart valves.
    Arcidiacono G; Corvi A; Severi T
    J Biomech; 2005 Jul; 38(7):1483-90. PubMed ID: 15922759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computational fluid dynamics simulation of transcatheter aortic valve degeneration.
    Dwyer HA; Matthews PB; Azadani A; Jaussaud N; Ge L; Guy TS; Tseng EE
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 Aug; 9(2):301-8. PubMed ID: 19414489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Role of mechanical stress in calcification of aortic bioprosthetic valves.
    Thubrikar MJ; Deck JD; Aouad J; Nolan SP
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1983 Jul; 86(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 6865456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dynamic simulation pericardial bioprosthetic heart valve function.
    Kim H; Lu J; Sacks MS; Chandran KB
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Oct; 128(5):717-24. PubMed ID: 16995758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The first step to understanding valve failure: an overview of pathology.
    Schoen FJ
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1992; 6 Suppl 1():S50-3. PubMed ID: 1389279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimization of a trileaflet valve design.
    Thubrikar MJ; Samanta S; Nolan SP
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1991; 1(2):171-92. PubMed ID: 10149054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measurement and reconstruction of the leaflet geometry for a pericardial artificial heart valve.
    Jiang H; Campbell G; Xi F
    Med Eng Phys; 2005 Mar; 27(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 15642513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stress analysis of porcine bioprosthetic heart valves in vivo.
    Thubrikar MJ; Skinner JR; Eppink RT; Nolan SP
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1982 Nov; 16(6):811-26. PubMed ID: 7174710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Hemodynamic performance of newly developed composite stentless porcine aortic valve: in vitro testing and in vivo experiment with sheep].
    Song GM; Zhou JY; Hu SS; Cui JW; Song YH; Tang Y; Zhang Y; Jiang H; Yuan WM; Song XY
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 88(29):2059-63. PubMed ID: 19080436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative analysis of mechanical and bioprosthetic valves after aortic valve replacement.
    Borkon AM; Soule LM; Baughman KL; Aoun H; Baumgartner WA; Gardner TJ; Watkins L; Gott VL; Reitz BA
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Jul; 94(1):20-33. PubMed ID: 3600005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality control of bioprosthetic heart valves by means of holographic interferometry.
    Deiwick M; Glasmacher B; Zarubin AM; Reul H; Geiger A; von Bally G; Stargardt A; Rau G; Scheld HH
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Jul; 5(4):441-7; discussion 439-40. PubMed ID: 8858512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An experimentally derived stress resultant shell model for heart valve dynamic simulations.
    Kim H; Chandran KB; Sacks MS; Lu J
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2007 Jan; 35(1):30-44. PubMed ID: 17089074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of the design and dynamics of aortic bioprostheses in vivo.
    Thubrikar M; Skinner JR; Aouad J; Finkelmeier BA; Nolan SP
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1982 Aug; 84(2):282-90. PubMed ID: 7098513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Degeneration of bioprosthetic heart valve cusp and wall tissues is initiated during tissue preparation: an ultrastructural study.
    Simionescu DT; Lovekamp JJ; Vyavahare NR
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Mar; 12(2):226-34. PubMed ID: 12701796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cardiac valve replacement: a bioengineering approach.
    Korossis SA; Fisher J; Ingham E
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2000; 10(2):83-124. PubMed ID: 11086842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tears in bioprosthetic heart valve leaflets without calcific degeneration.
    Haziza F; Papouin G; Barratt-Boyes B; Christie G; Whitlock R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Jan; 5(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 8834723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The SynerGraft valve: a new acellular (nonglutaraldehyde-fixed) tissue heart valve for autologous recellularization first experimental studies before clinical implantation.
    O'Brien MF; Goldstein S; Walsh S; Black KS; Elkins R; Clarke D
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1999 Oct; 11(4 Suppl 1):194-200. PubMed ID: 10660192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.