These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1389638)

  • 1. Axes: focus of taxonomy II.
    Hoskins LM; Kerr ME; Fitzpatrick JJ; Warren JJ; Avant K; Carpenito LJ; Hurley ME; Jakob D; Lunney M; Mills WC
    Nurs Diagn; 1992; 3(3):117-23. PubMed ID: 1389638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of definitions for taxonomy II.
    Kerr ME; Hoskins LM; Fitzpatrick JJ; Warren JJ; Avant KC; Carpenito LJ; Hurley ME; Jakob D; Lunney M; Mills WC
    Nurs Diagn; 1992; 3(2):65-71. PubMed ID: 1610618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Processes and methodologies for research validation of nursing diagnoses.
    Whitley GG
    Nurs Diagn; 1999; 10(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 10358519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The development of NANDA's nursing diagnosis taxonomy.
    Warren JJ; Hoskins LM
    Nurs Diagn; 1990; 1(4):162-8. PubMed ID: 2291859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of nursing diagnosis with population groups.
    Neufeld A; Harrison MJ
    Nurs Diagn; 1994; 5(4):165-71. PubMed ID: 7826721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Meeting the criteria of a nursing diagnosis classification: Evaluation of ICNP, ICF, NANDA and ZEFP.
    Müller-Staub M; Lavin MA; Needham I; van Achterberg T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2007 Jul; 44(5):702-13. PubMed ID: 16556445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development and content validity testing of a comprehensive classification of diagnoses for pediatric nurse practitioners.
    Burns C
    Nurs Diagn; 1991; 2(3):93-104. PubMed ID: 1931307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. From taxonomy I to taxonomy II.
    Kerr M; Hoskins L; Fitzpatrick J; Hurley M; Mills W; Rottkamp B; Warren J; Carpenito L
    Nurs Diagn; 1991; 2(3):131-6. PubMed ID: 1931305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [To represent needs of nursing care using nursing diagnoses: potentials and restrictions of the NANDA classification and ICNP].
    Schilder M
    Pflege Z; 2005 Mar; 58(3):2-8. PubMed ID: 15801705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intensive care nursing scoring system. Part 1: Classification of nursing diagnoses.
    Pyykkö AK; Laurila J; Ala-Kokko TI; Hentinen M; Janhonen SA
    Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 2000 Dec; 16(6):345-56. PubMed ID: 11091466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative methods for clinical validation of nursing diagnoses.
    Carlson-Catalano J; Lunney M
    Clin Nurse Spec; 1995 Nov; 9(6):306-11. PubMed ID: 8697372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Advanced Nursing Process quality: Comparing the International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP) with the NANDA-International (NANDA-I) and Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC).
    Rabelo-Silva ER; Dantas Cavalcanti AC; Ramos Goulart Caldas MC; Lucena AF; Almeida MA; Linch GF; da Silva MB; Müller-Staub M
    J Clin Nurs; 2017 Feb; 26(3-4):379-387. PubMed ID: 27192041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. NANDA nursing diagnoses identification and validation in a neonatal unit.
    González Carrión P; Sánchez García R; de Dios Luna de Castillo J; Arcas Ruiz P; Palma Ruiz A
    Pediatr Nurs; 1997; 23(4):351-8. PubMed ID: 9282047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Taxonomic validation: an overview.
    Kerr M; Hoskins LM; Fitzpatrick JJ; Warren JJ; Avant KC; Hurley M; Lunney M; Mills WC; Rottkamp BC
    Nurs Diagn; 1993; 4(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 8363917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The developmental processes for NANDA International Nursing Diagnoses.
    Scroggins LM
    Int J Nurs Terminol Classif; 2008; 19(2):57-64. PubMed ID: 18476845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The development of nursing diagnoses for aggregates and groups.
    Neufeld A; Harrison MJ
    Public Health Nurs; 1990 Dec; 7(4):251-5. PubMed ID: 2270224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nursing diagnoses: a Dutch perspective.
    Leih P; Salentijn C
    J Clin Nurs; 1994 Sep; 3(5):313-20. PubMed ID: 7834142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Concept analysis as foundational to nursing diagnosis research.
    Whitley GG
    Nurs Diagn; 1995; 6(2):91-2. PubMed ID: 7619607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conceptual and research-based validation of nursing diagnoses: 1950 to 1993. NANDA Research Committee.
    Dougherty CM; Jankin JK; Lunney MR; Whitley GG
    Nurs Diagn; 1993; 4(4):156-65. PubMed ID: 8280510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Environmental nursing diagnoses: a proposal for further development of Taxonomy II.
    Green PM; Polk LV; Slade DS
    Int J Nurs Terminol Classif; 2003; 14(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 12747303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.