These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13899535)

  • 1. Masking and bone conduction. A case report.
    GOETZINGER CP; PROUD GO; EMBREY JE
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1962; 54():287-91. PubMed ID: 13899535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On masking in bone-conduction testing.
    STUDEBAKER GA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1962 Sep; 5():215-27. PubMed ID: 14037795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. BONE CONDUCTION AND NOISE MASKING.
    WESTON PB
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1965; ():SUPPL 204:1+. PubMed ID: 14310789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. BONE-CONDUCTION MEASUREMENTS. EFFECTS OF VIBRATOR, PLACEMENT, AND MASKING.
    DIRKS D
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1964 Jun; 79():594-9. PubMed ID: 14135076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Use of narrow band masking by bone conduction in clinical audiometry].
    Pestalozza G; Moretti A; Tenaglia C
    Ann Laringol Otol Rinol Faringol; 1965; 64(4):352-70. PubMed ID: 5898257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Warbled tone masking in bone-conduction audiometry.
    Prather WF; Shapley JL; Smith RA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1970 Jun; 13(2):339-46. PubMed ID: 5421452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CLINICAL MASKING OF AIR- AND BONE-CONDUCTED STIMULI.
    STUDEBAKER GA
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1964 Feb; 29():23-35. PubMed ID: 14122665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Masking through bone and MLD (masking level difference): data on the variability of the effect].
    Quaranta A; Cervellera G
    Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper; 1973 Feb; 49(3):155-7. PubMed ID: 4786549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Audiometric Bing test for determination of minimum masking levels for bone-conduction tests.
    Martin FN; Butler EC; Burns P
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1974 May; 39(2):148-52. PubMed ID: 4825804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Effect of masking noise on bone conduction thresholds].
    Rakhmilevich AG
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1970; 32(6):67-72. PubMed ID: 5496854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Probe to the bone-conduction phenomenon].
    Zeng X; Gong S; Zhong N
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Apr; 18(4):204-6. PubMed ID: 15318631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Collapse of the ear canal during masking for bone conduction.
    Sauer RC; Ford CN
    Am J Otol; 1986 Jan; 7(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 3946583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. SPREAD OF MASKING IN EARS SHOWING ABNORMAL ADAPTATION AND CONDUCTIVE DEAFNESS.
    HARBERT F; YOUNG IM
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1965; 60():49-58. PubMed ID: 14337957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Individual masking levels in pure tone audiometry.
    Veniar FA
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1965 Nov; 82(5):518-21. PubMed ID: 5844991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Influence of masking noise on the threshold of bone conduction].
    Rakhmilevich AG
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1971; 33(3):26-30. PubMed ID: 5097344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [COMPARATIVE STUDIES OF BONE CONDUCTION AUDIOMETRY].
    TRONCZYNSKA J
    Otolaryngol Pol; 1965; 19():77-82. PubMed ID: 14318878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The masking dilemma and its solution. Fusion at the inferred threshold (FIT) and sensorineural acuity level (SAL) tests.
    Chaplin RG; Miyamoto RT
    Am J Otol; 1983 Jul; 5(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 6881307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [A basic study on bone conduction audiometry].
    NANDATE J
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1962 Jul; 65():807-20. PubMed ID: 13937543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical masking of the nontest ear.
    Studebaker GA
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1967 Nov; 32(4):360-71. PubMed ID: 6074896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Clicks by bone conduction versus bone-conducted masking for evaluations of brain stem auditory evoked potentials in pediatric patients].
    Ysunza A
    Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex; 1985 Feb; 42(2):99-106. PubMed ID: 3986037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.