These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1389993)

  • 1. A comparison of standard cultural methods for the detection of foodborne Salmonella.
    D'Aoust JY; Sewell AM; Warburton DW
    Int J Food Microbiol; 1992 May; 16(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 1389993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficacy of prolonged (48 h) selective enrichment for the detection of foodborne Salmonella.
    D'Aoust JY; Sewell AM; Jean A
    Int J Food Microbiol; 1992; 15(1-2):121-30. PubMed ID: 1622748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of several methods for the isolation of salmonellae from egg products.
    van Schothorst M; van Leusden FM
    Can J Microbiol; 1975 Jul; 21(7):1041-5. PubMed ID: 1097076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of standard cultural methods for the detection of foodborne Salmonella species including three new chromogenic plating media.
    Schönenbrücher V; Mallinson ET; Bülte M
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2008 Mar; 123(1-2):61-6. PubMed ID: 18192050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [A comparison of methods for the enrichment of Salmonellae from human feces].
    Müller HE
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1982 Nov; 253(2):183-96. PubMed ID: 6762012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Limited Sensitivity of Short (6 h) Selective Enrichment for Detection of Foodborne Salmonella.
    D'Aoust JY; Sewell A; Jean A
    J Food Prot; 1990 Jul; 53(7):562-565. PubMed ID: 31018367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of selenite F, Muller-Kauffmann tetrathionate and Rappaport's medium for salmonella isolation from chicken giblets after pre-enrichment in buffered peptone water.
    Harvey RW; Price TH
    J Hyg (Lond); 1981 Oct; 87(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 7026671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detection of Salmonella spp. in tropical seafood by polymerase chain reaction.
    Sanath Kumar H; Sunil R; Venugopal MN; Karunasagar I; Karunasagar I
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2003 Nov; 88(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 14527790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of six different plating media used in the isolation of Salmonella.
    Warburton DW; Bowen B; Konkle A; Crawford C; Durzi S; Foster R; Fox C; Gour L; Krohn G; LaCasse P
    Int J Food Microbiol; 1994 Jun; 22(4):277-89. PubMed ID: 7986679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ICMSF methods studies. IX. The influence of selective enrichment broths, differential planting media, and incubation temperatues on the detection of Salmonella in dried foods and feed ingredients.
    Gabis DA; Silliker JH
    Can J Microbiol; 1977 Sep; 23(9):1225-31. PubMed ID: 907918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison between semisolid Rappaport and modified semisolid Rappaport-Vassiliadis media for the isolation of Salmonella spp. from foods and feeds.
    Perales I; Erkiaga E
    Int J Food Microbiol; 1991 Oct; 14(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 1742172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of a new enrichment broth for the isolation of Salmonella spp. from poultry products.
    Blivet D; Salvat G; Humbert F; Colin P
    Int J Food Microbiol; 1997 Sep; 38(2-3):211-6. PubMed ID: 9506286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of selective enrichment broths and chromogenic media for Salmonella detection in highly contaminated chicken carcasses.
    Hyeon JY; Park JH; Chon JW; Wee SH; Moon JS; Kim YJ; Seo KH
    Poult Sci; 2012 May; 91(5):1222-6. PubMed ID: 22499882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relative effectiveness of selenite cystine broth, tetrathionate broth, and Rappaport-Vassiliadis medium for the recovery of Salmonella from raw flesh and other highly contaminated foods: precollaborative study.
    June GA; Sherrod PS; Hammack TS; Amaguana RM; Andrews WH
    J AOAC Int; 1995; 78(2):375-80. PubMed ID: 7756852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection of Salmonella in dry foods using refrigerated pre-enrichment and enrichment broth cultures: interlaboratory study.
    D'Aoust JY; Sewell AM; Greco P
    J AOAC Int; 1993; 76(4):814-21. PubMed ID: 8374327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ISOLATION OF SALMONELLAE FROM FOOD SAMPLES. VI. COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR THE ISOLATION OF SALMONELLA FROM EGG PRODUCTS.
    SILLIKER JH; DEIBEL RH; FAGAN PT
    Appl Microbiol; 1964 May; 12(3):224-8. PubMed ID: 14170960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Limitations of lysine-iron-cystine-neutral red broth in the presumptive identification of Salmonella.
    D'Aoust JY
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1977 Nov; 34(5):595-6. PubMed ID: 931379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of an International Method for Detection of Salmonella in Chocolate and Cocoa Products.
    D'Aoust JY; Sewell A
    J Food Prot; 1984 Feb; 47(2):111-113. PubMed ID: 30921912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Salmonella in eviscerated chickens from processing plants of greater Buenos Aires].
    Mercado EC
    Rev Argent Microbiol; 1983; 15(4):187-92. PubMed ID: 6400768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. New method of isolating Salmonellae from milk.
    Wells JG; Morris GK; Brachman PS
    Appl Microbiol; 1971 Feb; 21(2):235-9. PubMed ID: 5544283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.