These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1389993)

  • 21. Relative effectiveness of selenite cystine broth, tetrathionate broth, and Rappaport-Vassiliadis medium for the recovery of Salmonella spp. from foods with a low microbial load.
    Hammack TS; Amaguaña RM; June GA; Sherrod PS; Andrews WH
    J Food Prot; 1999 Jan; 62(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 9921822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of four different methods for Salmonella detection in fecal samples of porcine origin.
    Korsak N; Degeye JN; Etienne G; China B; Daube G
    J Food Prot; 2004 Oct; 67(10):2158-64. PubMed ID: 15508624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of fluorescent-antibody methods and enrichment serology for the detection of Salmonella.
    Mohr HK; Trenk HL; Yeterian M
    Appl Microbiol; 1974 Feb; 27(2):324-8. PubMed ID: 4595958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparison of the efficiency of Rappaport-Vassiliadis, tetrathionate and selenite broths with and without pre-enrichment for the isolation of Salmonella in animal waste biogas plants.
    Schlundt J; Munch B
    Zentralbl Bakteriol; 1993 Aug; 279(3):336-43. PubMed ID: 8219504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of Selective-Enrichment and Chromogenic Media for Salmonella Detection in Raw Shell Egg Contents with a Low Microbial Load.
    Lee SK; Song KY; Chon JW; Kim DH; Seo KH
    Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2017 Jul; 14(7):414-418. PubMed ID: 28418715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of stool storage at room temperature on salmonella isolation from faeces.
    Harvey RW; Price TH
    J Hyg (Lond); 1983 Oct; 91(2):267-71. PubMed ID: 6644012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Factors influencing detection of salmonellae in rendered animal by-products.
    Tompkin RB; Kueper TV
    Appl Microbiol; 1973 Apr; 25(4):485-7. PubMed ID: 4572978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of methods for the isolation of Salmonella from imported frog legs.
    Andrews WH; Wilson CR; Poelma PL; Romero A
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1977 Jan; 33(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 319756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparative study of cultural methods for the detection of Salmonella in feed and feed ingredients.
    Koyuncu S; Haggblom P
    BMC Vet Res; 2009 Feb; 5():6. PubMed ID: 19192298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Relative effectiveness of selenite cystine broth, tetrathionate broth, and rappaport-vassiliadis medium for recovery of Salmonella spp. from raw flesh, highly contaminated foods, and poultry feed: collaborative study.
    June GA; Sherrod PS; Hammack TS; Amaguaña RM; Andrews WH
    J AOAC Int; 1996; 79(6):1307-23. PubMed ID: 8946709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of the enrichment medium on the detection and diversity of Salmonella from porcine duodenal content.
    De Busser EV; Maes D; Houf K; Dewulf J; De Zutter L
    Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2013 Feb; 10(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 23336270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Detection of Salmonella-containing food using the 1-2 test].
    Weber A; Rackelmann E
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1991 Jul; 104(7):233-5. PubMed ID: 1898322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effective Enrichment-Plating Conditions for Detection of Salmonella in Foods.
    D'Aoust JY
    J Food Prot; 1984 Aug; 47(8):588-590. PubMed ID: 30934402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of type of enrichment and duration of incubation on salmonella recovery from meat-and-bone meal.
    Huhtanen CN; Naghski J
    Appl Microbiol; 1972 Mar; 23(3):578-85. PubMed ID: 4553803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of methods for the isolation of Salmonella from bone meal.
    Gerichter CB; Sechter I
    Appl Microbiol; 1966 Sep; 14(5):711-5. PubMed ID: 5339301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Isolation of Salmonella using three selective enrichment broths from sausages naturally contaminated. Its relationship with other microorganisms that produce food toxi-infections.
    Muñoz A; Frapolli E; Moriñigo MA; Borrego JJ; Romero P
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B Umwelthyg Krankenhaushyg Arbeitshyg Prav Med; 1987 Oct; 185(1-2):105-11. PubMed ID: 3124372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Secondary selective enrichment of salmonellae from naturally contaminated specimens by using a selective motility system.
    Smeltzer TI; Duncalfe F
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1979 Apr; 37(4):725-8. PubMed ID: 453839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Rapid Cultural Methods for Detection of Salmonella in Feeds and Feed Ingredients.
    D'Aoust JY; Sewell A; Boville A
    J Food Prot; 1983 Oct; 46(10):851-855. PubMed ID: 30921845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The isolation of salmonellas from British pork sausages and sausage meat.
    Roberts D; Boag K; Hall ML; Shipp CR
    J Hyg (Lond); 1975 Oct; 75(2):173-84. PubMed ID: 1100710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of incubation temperature and sodium heptadecyl sulfate (Tergitol No. 7) on the isolation of salmonellae from pork sausage.
    Morris GK; Dunn CG
    Appl Microbiol; 1970 Aug; 20(2):192-5. PubMed ID: 4921059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.