109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1390473)
1. Cone biopsy: has endocervical sampling a role?
Anderson DJ; Strachan F; Parkin DE
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Aug; 99(8):668-70. PubMed ID: 1390473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of cervical cytology and colposcopy in detecting cervical glandular neoplasia.
Ullal A; Roberts M; Bulmer JN; Mathers ME; Wadehra V
Cytopathology; 2009 Dec; 20(6):359-66. PubMed ID: 18557985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the cervical canal with the endocervical brush.
Hoffman MS; Sterghos S; Gordy LW; Gunasekaran S; Cavanagh D
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 82(4 Pt 1):573-7. PubMed ID: 8377985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Endocervical sampling using brush versus curette: a single centre experience and literature review.
Mitric C; Lakabi R; Kligun G; Matanes E; Lau S; Gotlieb WH; Salvador S
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2023 Dec; 43(1):2162866. PubMed ID: 36689210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Role of endocervical curettage in colposcopy.
Hatch KD; Shingleton HM; Orr JW; Gore H; Soong SJ
Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Mar; 65(3):403-8. PubMed ID: 3974966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Endocervical brush cytology. An alternative to endocervical curettage?
Weitzman GA; Korhonen MO; Reeves KO; Irwin JF; Carter TS; Kaufman RH
J Reprod Med; 1988 Aug; 33(8):677-83. PubMed ID: 3172071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is it time for a reconsideration of the criteria for cone biopsy?
Lopes A; Pearson SE; Mor-Yosef S; Ireland D; Monaghan JM
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1989 Nov; 96(11):1345-7. PubMed ID: 2611175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microcolposcopy vs. cone histology in evaluation of the endocervix in women with inadequate colposcopy or positive endocervical curettage.
Hunter V; Tseng P
J Reprod Med; 1989 Sep; 34(9):625-8. PubMed ID: 2810245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomized trial of the sleeved cytobrush and the endocervical curette.
Boardman LA; Meinz H; Steinhoff MM; Heber WW; Blume J
Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Mar; 101(3):426-30. PubMed ID: 12636943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A randomized trial of three methods of obtaining Papanicolaou smears.
Pretorius RG; Sadeghi M; Fotheringham N; Semrad N; Watring WG
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):831-6. PubMed ID: 1923208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the use of the endocervical brush after endocervical curettage.
Tate KM; Strickland JL
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Nov; 90(5):715-7. PubMed ID: 9351750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability of colposcopy and directed punch biopsy.
Skehan M; Soutter WP; Lim K; Krausz T; Pryse-Davies J
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1990 Sep; 97(9):811-6. PubMed ID: 2242366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Some observations on the value of endocervical curettage performed as an integral part of colposcopic examination of patients with abnormal cervical cytology.
Urcuyo R; Rome RM; Nelson JH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1977 Aug; 128(7):787-92. PubMed ID: 879246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of endocervical curettage in satisfactory colposcopy.
el-Dabh A; Rogers RE; Davis TE; Sutton GP
Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Aug; 74(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 2748050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis of outcome in women with borderline glandular change on cervical cytology.
Jadoon BA; Kehoe S; Romain K; Clelland C; Sundar SS
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Nov; 147(1):83-5. PubMed ID: 19740591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Endocervical curettage in the evaluation of cervical disease in patients with adequate colposcopy.
Soisson AP; Molina CY; Benson WL
Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Jan; 71(1):109-11. PubMed ID: 3336531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Abnormal Papanicolaou smears. Evaluation by colposcopy, biopsies, and endocervical curettage.
Townsend DE; Ostergard DR; Mishell DR; Hirose FM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1970 Oct; 108(3):429-34. PubMed ID: 5484600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Endocervical curettage as a routine part of colposcopic examinations for abnormal cervical cytology.
Saltzman DH; Evans MI; Warsof SL; Friedman AJ
J Reprod Med; 1985 Nov; 30(11):871-3. PubMed ID: 4078822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The "unsatisfactory" colposcopic examination.
Rochelson B; Krumholz BA
J Reprod Med; 1983 Feb; 28(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 6834353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of two preparation methods for endocervical evaluation.
Kim HS; Park JS; Park JY; Hong SR; Seong SJ; Kim HS; Wilbur DC
Acta Cytol; 2007; 51(5):742-8. PubMed ID: 17910344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
