These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1390574)

  • 1. Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets with chemical or mechanical retention.
    Forsberg CM; Hagberg C
    Br J Orthod; 1992 Aug; 19(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 1390574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of enamel bleaching on the shear bond strengths of metal and ceramic brackets.
    Oztaş E; Bağdelen G; Kiliçoğlu H; Ulukapi H; Aydin I
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):232-7. PubMed ID: 21262931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro comparison of the retention capacity of new aesthetic brackets.
    Fernandez L; Canut JA
    Eur J Orthod; 1999 Feb; 21(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 10191580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparisons of shear bond strength of precoated and uncoated brackets.
    Bishara SE; Olsen M; Von Wald L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Dec; 112(6):617-21. PubMed ID: 9423693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shear bond strength of rebonded mechanically retentive ceramic brackets.
    Chung CH; Friedman SD; Mante FK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Sep; 122(3):282-7. PubMed ID: 12226610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ceramic bracket bonding: a comparison of shear, tensile, and torsional bond strengths of ceramic brackets.
    Merrill SW; Oesterle LJ; Hermesch CB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Sep; 106(3):290-7. PubMed ID: 8074094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bond strength: a comparison between chemical coated and mechanical interlock bases of ceramic and metal brackets.
    Wang WN; Meng CL; Tarng TH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Apr; 111(4):374-81. PubMed ID: 9109582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the bond strength of different bracket-bonding systems to bovine enamel.
    Nkenke E; Hirschfelder U; Martus P; Eberhard H
    Eur J Orthod; 1997 Jun; 19(3):259-70. PubMed ID: 9239956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the debonding characteristics of two innovative ceramic bracket designs.
    Bishara SE; Olsen ME; VonWald L; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jul; 116(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 10393585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of light-cured filled sealant on shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
    Varlik SK; Ulusoy C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 19201326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of shear bond strengths between new and recycled ceramic brackets.
    Lew KK; Chew CL; Lee KW
    Eur J Orthod; 1991 Aug; 13(4):306-10. PubMed ID: 1915619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of modifying the bonding protocol on the shear bond strength of metallic and ceramic orthodontic brackets.
    Fernandes TM; Janson G; Somensi J; Pinzan A; Francisconi PA; Sathler R; Henriques JF
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 22313980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of debonding characteristics of a new collapsible ceramic bracket.
    Bishara SE; Olsen ME; Von Wald L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Nov; 112(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 9387843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bond strength following the application of chlorhexidine on etched enamel.
    Damon PL; Bishara SE; Olsen ME; Jakobsen JR
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(3):169-72. PubMed ID: 9188959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A post-treatment evaluation of multibonded ceramic brackets in orthodontics.
    Artun J
    Eur J Orthod; 1997 Apr; 19(2):219-28. PubMed ID: 9183072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Shear bond strength of ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel.
    Britton JC; McInnes P; Weinberg R; Ledoux WR; Retief DH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Oct; 98(4):348-53. PubMed ID: 2145756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shear bond strength of a mechanically retained ceramic bracket.
    Carty G; Tyas MJ
    Aust Orthod J; 1993 Oct; 13(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 16429853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of varying etching times on the bond strength of ceramic brackets.
    Olsen ME; Bishara SE; Boyer DB; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Apr; 109(4):403-9. PubMed ID: 8638582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ceramic bracket bonding: a comparison of bond strength with polyacrylic acid and phosphoric acid enamel conditioning.
    Maskeroni AJ; Meyers CE; Lorton L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Feb; 97(2):168-75. PubMed ID: 2137285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of bond strength between simple foil mesh and laser-structured base retention brackets.
    Sorel O; El Alam R; Chagneau F; Cathelineau G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Sep; 122(3):260-6. PubMed ID: 12226606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.