These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1390574)

  • 21. Evaluation of the shear bond strength of different ceramic bracket base designs.
    Olsen ME; Bishara SE; Jakobsen JR
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(3):179-82. PubMed ID: 9188961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Recycling effects on ceramic brackets: a dimensional, weight and shear bond strength analysis.
    Martina R; Laino A; Cacciafesta V; Cantiello P
    Eur J Orthod; 1997 Dec; 19(6):629-36. PubMed ID: 9458596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The influence of orthodontic bracket base design on shear bond strength.
    Sharma-Sayal SK; Rossouw PE; Kulkarni GV; Titley KC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Jul; 124(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 12867901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of shear bond strength of three bonding agents with metal and ceramic brackets.
    Haydar B; Sarikaya S; Cehreli ZC
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):457-62. PubMed ID: 10515144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bond strengths of two ceramic brackets using argon laser, light, and chemically cured resin systems.
    Weinberger SJ; Foley TF; McConnell RJ; Wright GZ
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 9188960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Alternatives to ceramic brackets: the tensile bond strengths of two aesthetic brackets compared ex vivo with stainless steel foil-mesh bracket bases.
    Arici S; Regan D
    Br J Orthod; 1997 May; 24(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 9218111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of various methods of chlorhexidine application on shear bond strength.
    Bishara SE; Vonwald L; Zamtua J; Damon PL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Aug; 114(2):150-3. PubMed ID: 9714279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Bond strengths and debonding characteristics of two types of polycrystalline ceramic brackets.
    Lemke K; Xu X; Hagan JL; Armbruster PC; Ballard RW
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 Nov; 26(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 21175022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. In vitro peel/shear bond strength evaluation of orthodontic bracket base design.
    Willems G; Carels CE; Verbeke G
    J Dent; 1997; 25(3-4):271-8. PubMed ID: 9175357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An in vitro evaluation of a metal reinforced orthodontic ceramic bracket.
    Mundstock KS; Sadowsky PL; Lacefield W; Bae S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Dec; 116(6):635-41. PubMed ID: 10587597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An easily removable ceramic bracket?
    Fox NA; McCabe JF
    Br J Orthod; 1992 Nov; 19(4):305-9. PubMed ID: 1463706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Shear strength of ceramic brackets bonded to etched or unetched enamel.
    Garcia-Godoy F; Martin S
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1995; 19(3):181-3. PubMed ID: 8611486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bond strength of aged composites found in brackets placed by an indirect technique.
    Shiau JY; Rasmussen ST; Phelps AE; Enlow DH; Wolf GR
    Angle Orthod; 1993; 63(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 8214790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Bond strengths of orthodontic brackets to restorative resin composite surfaces.
    Lai PY; Woods MG; Tyas MJ
    Aust Orthod J; 1999 Apr; 15(4):235-45. PubMed ID: 11933358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Shear strength of ceramic brackets bonded to porcelain.
    Whitlock BO; Eick JD; Ackerman RJ; Glaros AG; Chappell RP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Oct; 106(4):358-64. PubMed ID: 7942650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The crystal growth technique--a laboratory evaluation of bond strengths.
    Jones SP; Gledhill JR; Davies EH
    Eur J Orthod; 1999 Feb; 21(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 10191582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Bond strength of disinfected metal and ceramic brackets: an in vitro study.
    Speer C; Zimny D; Hopfenmueller W; Holtgrave EA
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Sep; 75(5):836-42. PubMed ID: 16279832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Bond strength of ceramic brackets under shear stress: an in vitro report.
    Viazis AD; Cavanaugh G; Bevis RR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Sep; 98(3):214-21. PubMed ID: 2144942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In vitro shearing force testing of the Australian zirconia-based ceramic Begg bracket.
    Kittipibul P; Godfrey K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Sep; 108(3):308-15. PubMed ID: 7661149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Torsional bond strength and failure pattern of ceramic brackets bonded to composite resin laminate veneers.
    Kao EC; Eliades T; Rezvan E; Johnston WM
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Dec; 17(6):533-40. PubMed ID: 8682171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.