These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1390574)

  • 41. The extent of enamel surface fractures. A quantitative comparison of thermally debonded ceramic and mechanically debonded metal brackets by energy dispersive micro- and image-analysis.
    Stratmann U; Schaarschmidt K; Wegener H; Ehmer U
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Dec; 18(6):655-62. PubMed ID: 9009430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Bond strengths of five different ceramic brackets: an in vitro study.
    Winchester LJ
    Eur J Orthod; 1991 Aug; 13(4):293-305. PubMed ID: 1915618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effect of bracket base conditioning.
    Faltermeier A; Behr M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):12.e1-5; discussion 12-3. PubMed ID: 19121493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effects of saliva and water contamination on the enamel shear bond strength of a light-cured glass ionomer cement.
    Cacciafesta V; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Süssenberger U; Miethke RR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Apr; 113(4):402-7. PubMed ID: 9563355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Debonding characteristics of a polymer mesh base ceramic bracket bonded with two different conditioning methods.
    Elekdag-Turk S; Isci D; Ozkalayci N; Turk T
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 19164413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Shear/peel bond strength of repositioned ceramic brackets.
    Gaffey PG; Major PW; Glover K; Grace M; Koehler JR
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(5):351-7. PubMed ID: 8526294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Physical and adhesive properties of dental enamel after radiotherapy and bonding of metal and ceramic brackets.
    Santin GC; Palma-Dibb RG; Romano FL; de Oliveira HF; Nelson Filho P; de Queiroz AM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Aug; 148(2):283-92. PubMed ID: 26232837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Microleakage under metallic and ceramic brackets bonded with orthodontic self-etching primer systems.
    Uysal T; Ulker M; Ramoglu SI; Ertas H
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):1089-94. PubMed ID: 18947278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The use of debonding pliers in the removal of ceramic brackets: force levels and enamel cracks.
    Bishara SE; Fonseca JM; Boyer DB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Sep; 108(3):242-8. PubMed ID: 7661139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effect of reduction of phosphoric acid concentration on the shear bond strength of brackets.
    Carstensen W
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Sep; 108(3):274-7. PubMed ID: 7661144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. An investigation into the use of an anaerobic adhesive with two commercially available orthodontic brackets.
    Ireland AJ; Sherriff M
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 16364423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The effect of different bonding and debonding techniques on debonding ceramic orthodontic brackets.
    Sinha PK; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Aug; 112(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 9267223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Bond strengths of different orthodontic adhesives after enamel conditioning with the same self-etching primer.
    Scougall-Vilchis RJ; Zárate-Díaz C; Kusakabe S; Yamamoto K
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 20575206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. An in vitro comparison of shear bond strength of zirconia to enamel using different surface treatments.
    Zandparsa R; Talua NA; Finkelman MD; Schaus SE
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Feb; 23(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 23890275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The effect of air abrasion on the retention of metallic brackets bonded to fluorosed enamel surface.
    Suma S; Anita G; Chandra Shekar BR; Kallury A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):230-5. PubMed ID: 22945715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Bond strengths of ceramic brackets using different bonding techniques.
    Blight SJ; Lynch E
    Br J Orthod; 1995 Feb; 22(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 7786864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Evaluation of failure characteristics and bond strength after ceramic and polycarbonate bracket debonding: effect of bracket base silanization.
    Ozcan M; Finnema K; Ybema A
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 18209212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Retention capacity of the bracket bases of new esthetic orthodontic brackets.
    Blalock KA; Powers JM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Jun; 107(6):596-603. PubMed ID: 7771364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effect of different surface treatments for ceramic bracket base on bond strength of rebonded brackets.
    Guarita MK; Moresca AH; Losso EM; Moro A; Moresca RC; Correr GM
    Braz Dent J; 2015; 26(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 25672386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The effect of repeated bonding on the shear bond strength of different orthodontic adhesives.
    Bishara SE; Laffoon JF; Vonwald L; Warren JJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 May; 121(5):521-5. PubMed ID: 12045771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.