These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1390577)

  • 1. The performance of first molar orthodontic bands cemented with glass ionomer cement--a retrospective analysis.
    Millett DT; Gordon PH
    Br J Orthod; 1992 Aug; 19(3):215-20. PubMed ID: 1390577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Banding versus bonding of first permanent molars: a multi-centre randomized controlled trial.
    Nazir M; Walsh T; Mandall NA; Matthew S; Fox D
    J Orthod; 2011 Jun; 38(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 21677099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Resin-modified glass ionomer, modified composite or conventional glass ionomer for band cementation?--an in vitro evaluation.
    Millett DT; Cummings A; Letters S; Roger E; Love J
    Eur J Orthod; 2003 Dec; 25(6):609-14. PubMed ID: 14700267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Glass ionomer cements in orthodontics--an update.
    Mizrahi E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1988 Jun; 93(6):505-7. PubMed ID: 3287898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro comparison of orthodontic band cements.
    Millett DT; Duff S; Morrison L; Cummings A; Gilmour WH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Jan; 123(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 12532057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison between zinc polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cement in the orthodontic band cementation.
    Dincer B; Erdinc AM
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2002; 26(3):285-8. PubMed ID: 11990053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modified composite or conventional glass ionomer for band cementation? A comparative clinical trial.
    Gillgrass TJ; Benington PC; Millett DT; Newell J; Gilmour WH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jul; 120(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 11455377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microleakage of orthodontic band cement at the cement-enamel and cement-band interfaces.
    Uysal T; Ramoglu SI; Ertas H; Ulker M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):534-9. PubMed ID: 20362915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of sandblasting on the retention of first molar orthodontic bands cemented with glass ionomer cement.
    Millett DT; McCabe JF; Bennett TG; Carter NE; Gordon PH
    Br J Orthod; 1995 May; 22(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 7640255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
    Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A 12-month clinical comparison of resin-modified light-activated adhesives for the cementation of orthodontic molar bands.
    Fricker JP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Sep; 112(3):239-43. PubMed ID: 9294350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A clinical comparison of different powder: liquid ratios of two glass ionomer cements on the retention of orthodontic molar bands.
    Fricker JP
    Aust Orthod J; 1989 Oct; 11(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 2639660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An in vivo study on the merits of two glass ionomers for the cementation of orthodontic bands.
    Rezk-Lega F; Ogaard B; Arends J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Feb; 99(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 1990826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fluoride release from orthodontic band cements-a comparison of two in vitro models.
    Caves GR; Millett DT; Creanor SL; Foye RH; Gilmour WH
    J Dent; 2003 Jan; 31(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 12615016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of protective varnish on the integrity of orthodontic cements.
    Caldeira EM; Izquierdo Ade M; Giacomet F; Sant'Anna EF; Ruellas AC
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(6):45-50. PubMed ID: 24351149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tensile bond force of glass ionomer cements in direct bonding of orthodontic brackets: an in vitro comparative study.
    Rezk-Lega F; Ogaard B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Oct; 100(4):357-61. PubMed ID: 1833971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative laboratory investigation of dual-cured vs. conventional glass ionomer cements for band cementation.
    Millett DT; Kamahli K; McColl J
    Angle Orthod; 1998 Aug; 68(4):345-50. PubMed ID: 9709835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An in vitro study of the bond strength of light-cured glass ionomer cement in the bonding of orthodontic brackets.
    Cook PA; Luther F; Youngson CC
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Apr; 18(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 8670931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An ex vivo evaluation of resin-modified glass polyalkenoates and polyacid-modified composite resins as orthodontic band cements.
    Knox J; Chye KY; Durning P
    J Orthod; 2004 Dec; 31(4):323-8; discussion 301-2. PubMed ID: 15608348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Risk factors for periodontal changes in adult patients with banded second molars during orthodontic treatment.
    Corbacho de Melo MM; Cardoso MG; Faber J; Sobral A
    Angle Orthod; 2012 Mar; 82(2):224-8. PubMed ID: 21899378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.