These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1391682)

  • 1. Extended least squares curve fitting: a comparison of SIPHAR and MKMODEL.
    Cockshott ID; Haywood J
    Biopharm Drug Dispos; 1992 Aug; 13(6):461-80. PubMed ID: 1391682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimation problem due to multiple solutions in pharmacokinetic curve fitting to two-compartment model and its avoidance.
    Murata K; Kohno K
    Biopharm Drug Dispos; 1989; 10(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 2923958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pharmacokinetic parameter estimations by minimum relative entropy method.
    Amisaki T; Eguchi S
    J Pharmacokinet Biopharm; 1995 Oct; 23(5):479-94. PubMed ID: 8656343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pk-fit: a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic and statistical data analysis software.
    Farenc C; Fabreguette JR; Bressolle F
    Comput Biomed Res; 2000 Oct; 33(5):315-29. PubMed ID: 11017724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters by orthogonal regression: comparison of four algorithms.
    Tod M; Aouimer A; Petitjean O
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2002 Jan; 67(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 11750944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
    Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
    Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selection.
    Varma S; Simon R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Feb; 7():91. PubMed ID: 16504092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A note on fitting one-compartment models: non-linear least squares versus linear least squares using transformed data.
    Bailer AJ; Portier CJ
    J Appl Toxicol; 1990 Aug; 10(4):303-6. PubMed ID: 2391411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of methods for estimating individual pharmacokinetic parameters.
    Amisaki T; Eguchi S
    J Pharmacokinet Biopharm; 1999 Feb; 27(1):103-21. PubMed ID: 10533700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of objective functions for estimation of kinetic parameters.
    Muzic RF; Christian BT
    Med Phys; 2006 Feb; 33(2):342-53. PubMed ID: 16532939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A pharmacometric case study regarding the sensitivity of structural model parameter estimation to error in patient reported dosing times.
    Knights J; Rohatagi S
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2015 Dec; 42(6):627-37. PubMed ID: 26209956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of a direct 4D reconstruction method using generalised linear least squares for estimating nonlinear micro-parametric maps.
    Angelis GI; Matthews JC; Kotasidis FA; Markiewicz PJ; Lionheart WR; Reader AJ
    Ann Nucl Med; 2014 Nov; 28(9):860-73. PubMed ID: 25073760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Resimulation of noise: a precision estimator for least square error curve-fitting tested for axial strain time constant imaging.
    Nair SP; Righetti R
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 May; 60(9):3515-29. PubMed ID: 25856003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Application of non parametric methods to pharmacokinetic models of the Michaelis-Menten type.
    Pereira LM; Maya MT; Morais JA
    Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet; 1991; Spec No 3():497-500. PubMed ID: 1820929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating kinetic parameter maps from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using spatial prior knowledge.
    Kelm BM; Menze BH; Nix O; Zechmann CM; Hamprecht FA
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Oct; 28(10):1534-47. PubMed ID: 19369150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An evaluation of extended vs weighted least squares for parameter estimation in physiological modeling.
    Spilker ME; Vicini P
    J Biomed Inform; 2001 Oct; 34(5):348-64. PubMed ID: 12123152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of nonlinear regression with extended least squares: simulation study.
    Thomson AH; Kelman AW; Whiting B
    J Pharm Sci; 1985 Dec; 74(12):1327-30. PubMed ID: 4087201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimization of Active Muscle Force-Length Models Using Least Squares Curve Fitting.
    Mohammed GA; Hou M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2016 Mar; 63(3):630-5. PubMed ID: 26276984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Between classification-error approximation and weighted least-squares learning.
    Toh KA; Eng HL
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2008 Apr; 30(4):658-69. PubMed ID: 18276971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An evaluation of fitting methods for the sum of two hyperbolas: application to uptake studies.
    Burns DJ; Tucker SA
    Eur J Biochem; 1977 Nov; 81(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 590270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.