These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1392646)
1. Landmark decision for British homebirth & midwifery. Tew M Birth Gaz; 1992; 8(3):38-40. PubMed ID: 1392646 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A minority report: homebirth in Australia before and after the 2009 Maternity Services Review. Skerman JK J Law Med; 2013 Sep; 21(1):142-58. PubMed ID: 24218788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. SA government proposes to limit homebirth practitioners. Qld Nurse; 2013 Oct; 32(5):37. PubMed ID: 24325023 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Nurse is guilty of misconduct. Pract Midwife; 2000 Dec; 3(11):7. PubMed ID: 12026572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Is there a place for the lay midwife. Reid M Nurs Times; 1982 Aug 25-31; 78(34):1424-5. PubMed ID: 6922491 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The state of midwifery in British Columbia, Canada. Westfall R Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2002; (62):51-5. PubMed ID: 12101926 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Arizona regulations. Cleckner W Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2011; (99):6. PubMed ID: 21999045 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Legalization of midwifery and the issue of home births. McCourt C CMAJ; 1986 Aug; 135(4):285-8. PubMed ID: 3730994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Homebirth in Nigeria: obstacles and prospects. Ewere AI Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2005; (76):52-4. PubMed ID: 16419678 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Homebirth in Australia. The personal and the political. Buckley S Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2003; (66):49-50. PubMed ID: 12848047 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Regulating midwifery. Parallels in Texas and British Columbia. Johnson G Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2000; (56):29-31. PubMed ID: 11984896 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Choice, liberty and public health. Wickham S Pract Midwife; 2009 May; 12(5):4-5. PubMed ID: 19517962 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Home birth and the National Australian Maternity Services Review: too hot to handle? Dahlen H; Schmied V; Tracy SK; Jackson M; Cummings J; Priddis H Women Birth; 2011 Dec; 24(4):148-55. PubMed ID: 21074508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Satisfaction with planned place of birth among midwifery clients in British Columbia. Janssen PA; Carty EA; Reime B J Midwifery Womens Health; 2006; 51(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 16504905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Not addressing the root cause: An analysis of submissions made to the South Australian Government on a Proposal to Protect Midwifery Practice. Rigg E; Schmied V; Peters K; Dahlen H Women Birth; 2015 Jun; 28(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 25605583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Devolution and midwifery. 1: Wales and England. Delivering the future in Wales. Ferguson P Pract Midwife; 2002 Sep; 5(8):28-9. PubMed ID: 12298332 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Midwifery and the constitution. Smith EL Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2003; (65):33-5. PubMed ID: 12710149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The birth of a midwife (with a long latent phase). Waechter M Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2004; (72):36, 67. PubMed ID: 15651452 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]