These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

42 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1392955)

  • 1. Applied Machine Learning in Spiral Breast-CT: Can We Train a Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Automatic, Standardized and Observer Independent Classification of Breast Density?
    Landsmann A; Wieler J; Hejduk P; Ciritsis A; Borkowski K; Rossi C; Boss A
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Jan; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 35054348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Self-compression Technique vs Standard Compression in Mammography: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Henrot P; Boisserie-Lacroix M; Boute V; Troufléau P; Boyer B; Lesanne G; Gillon V; Desandes E; Netter E; Saadate M; Tardivon A; Grentzinger C; Salleron J; Oldrini G
    JAMA Intern Med; 2019 Mar; 179(3):407-414. PubMed ID: 30715083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Satisfaction, discomfort, obligations, and concerns in population-based breast cancer screening: cross-sectional study in a Danish population.
    Gabel P; Larsen MB; Nielsen PB; Svendstrup DB; Andersen B
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 Jul; 17(1):489. PubMed ID: 28709436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient comfort from the technologist perspective: factors to consider in mammographic imaging.
    Mendat CC; Mislan D; Hession-Kunz L
    Int J Womens Health; 2017; 9():359-364. PubMed ID: 28572739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of mammography experiences and satisfaction among American Indian/Alaska Native women.
    Ndikum-Moffor FM; Braiuca S; Daley CM; Gajewski BJ; Engelman KK
    Womens Health Issues; 2013; 23(6):e395-402. PubMed ID: 24183414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Toxicity of topical lidocaine applied to the breasts to reduce discomfort during screening mammography.
    Lambertz CK; Johnson CJ; Montgomery PG; Maxwell JR; Fry SJ
    J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2012 Apr; 28(2):200-4. PubMed ID: 22557743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An assessment of American Indian women's mammography experiences.
    Engelman KK; Daley CM; Gajewski BJ; Ndikum-Moffor F; Faseru B; Braiuca S; Joseph S; Ellerbeck EF; Greiner KA
    BMC Womens Health; 2010 Dec; 10():34. PubMed ID: 21159197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interventions for relieving the pain and discomfort of screening mammography.
    Miller D; Livingstone V; Herbison P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Jan; 2008(1):CD002942. PubMed ID: 18254010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Screening for breast cancer.
    Elmore JG; Armstrong K; Lehman CD; Fletcher SW
    JAMA; 2005 Mar; 293(10):1245-56. PubMed ID: 15755947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of access and satisfaction on regular mammogram and Papanicolaou test screening in a multiethnic population.
    Somkin CP; McPhee SJ; Nguyen T; Stewart S; Shema SJ; Nguyen B; Pasick R
    Med Care; 2004 Sep; 42(9):914-26. PubMed ID: 15319618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of the radiographer on the pain felt during mammography.
    Van Goethem M; Mortelmans D; Bruyninckx E; Verslegers I; Biltjes I; Van Hove E; De Schepper A
    Eur Radiol; 2003 Oct; 13(10):2384-9. PubMed ID: 14534806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical practice. Mammographic screening for breast cancer.
    Fletcher SW; Elmore JG
    N Engl J Med; 2003 Apr; 348(17):1672-80. PubMed ID: 12711743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mammography: influence of departmental practice and women's characteristics on patient satisfaction: comparison of six departments in Norway.
    Løken K; Steine S; Laerum E
    Qual Health Care; 1998 Sep; 7(3):136-41. PubMed ID: 10185139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prevention. How much harm? How much benefit? 3. Physical, psychological and social harm.
    Marshall KG
    CMAJ; 1996 Jul; 155(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 8800074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An unfree NHS and medical press in an unfree society.
    Smith R
    BMJ; 1994 Dec; 309(6969):1644-5. PubMed ID: 7819951
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does routine screening for breast cancer raise anxiety? Results from a three wave prospective study in England.
    Sutton S; Saidi G; Bickler G; Hunter J
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1995 Aug; 49(4):413-8. PubMed ID: 7650466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pain during mammography.
    Jenkins GC
    BMJ; 1992 Sep; 305(6855):718. PubMed ID: 1393147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Discomfort and pain during mammography: description, prediction, and prevention.
    Rutter DR; Calnan M; Vaile MS; Field S; Wade KA
    BMJ; 1992 Aug; 305(6851):443-5. PubMed ID: 1392955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pain and discomfort during mammography.
    Aro AR; Absetz-Ylöstalo P; Eerola T; Pamilo M; Lönnqvist J
    Eur J Cancer; 1996 Sep; 32A(10):1674-9. PubMed ID: 8983273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.