These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13932696)
1. [Vacuum or forceps extraction?]. MANASSE JP Sem Med; 1962 Sep; 121():1297-301. PubMed ID: 13932696 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY IN NEWBORN INFANTS AFTER NORMAL DELIVERY AND AFTER FORCEPS AND VACUUM EXTRACTION]. CACAVA KV Cesk Gynekol; 1964 Dec; 43():725-30. PubMed ID: 14250686 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [SPECULUM DELIVERY AND VACUUM EXTRACTION IN CLASSICAL OBSTETRICS]. WILLE P Zentralbl Gynakol; 1964 Aug; 86():1065-81. PubMed ID: 14249747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. FOLLOW-UP STUDY OF CHILDREN DELIVERED BY VACUUM-EXTRACTION AND BY FORCEPS. ZACHAU-CHRISTIANSEN B; VILLUMSEN A Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1965; 43():SUPPL 7:31-2. PubMed ID: 14286740 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative clinical study of the vacuum extractor and forceps. I. Preliminary observations. NYIRJESY I; HAWKS BL; FALLS HC; MUNSAT TL; PIERCE WE Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1963 Apr; 85():1071-82. PubMed ID: 13939310 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparative measurements on intracranial pressure following the use of the forceps and vacuum extractor]. BREHM H Arch Gynakol; 1963; 198():579-83. PubMed ID: 14015183 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [7 years of forceps and vacuum extractor]. HACKL H Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1963 Jan; 75():43-6. PubMed ID: 13951691 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative clinical study of the vacuum extractor and forceps. II. Evaluation of the newborn. MUNSAT TL; NEERHOUT R; NYIRJESY I Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1963 Apr; 85():1083-90. PubMed ID: 13936651 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [USE OF VAGINAL OBSTETRICAL OPERATIONS IN CEPHALIC PRESENTATION (FORCEPS, VACUUM EXTRACTION, SPECULUM DELIVERY, SCALP FORCEPS)]. STECH D Med Klin; 1963 Nov; 58():1785-94. PubMed ID: 14097656 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [SHOULD FORCEPS BE ELIMINATED FROM THE OBSTETRICAL SURGICAL ARSENAL?]. DA CUNHA DP Rev Clin Inst Matern Lisb; 1963; 14():13-20. PubMed ID: 14201922 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomised prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus vacuum extraction using defined criteria. Weerasekera DS; Premaratne S J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Jul; 22(4):344-5. PubMed ID: 12521450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Extractor or forceps?]. ROSA P Brux Med; 1962 Dec; 42():1561-7. PubMed ID: 13974747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]