These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1393395)

  • 1. An alternative approach to contrast-detail testing of X-ray image intensifier systems.
    Kotre CJ; Marshall NW; Faulkner K
    Br J Radiol; 1992 Aug; 65(776):686-90. PubMed ID: 1393395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Threshold contrast detail detectability curves for fluoroscopy and digital acquisition using modern image intensifier systems.
    Evans DS; Mackenzie A; Lawinski CP; Smith D
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Sep; 77(921):751-8. PubMed ID: 15447961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of a quality index in threshold contrast detail detection measurements in television fluoroscopy.
    Gallacher DJ; Mackenzie A; Batchelor S; Lynch J; Saunders JE
    Br J Radiol; 2003 Jul; 76(907):464-72. PubMed ID: 12857706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A figure of merit for the assessment of image intensifier systems.
    McRobbie DW; Hancock AP; Castellano IA
    Br J Radiol; 1992 Oct; 65(778):878-84. PubMed ID: 1422661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance assessment of X-ray image intensified television fluoroscopy systems in New Zealand.
    Poletti JL; Le Heron JC
    Br J Radiol; 1988 May; 61(725):393-400. PubMed ID: 3382870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Image quality assessment in digital mammography: part II. NPWE as a validated alternative for contrast detail analysis.
    Monnin P; Marshall NW; Bosmans H; Bochud FO; Verdun FR
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jul; 56(14):4221-38. PubMed ID: 21701050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Imaging properties of digital image-intensifier radiography compared to the conventional x-ray technic for chest pictures].
    Dölken W; Krahe T; Landwehr P; Lackner K
    Rofo; 1989 Jan; 150(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 2536505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality control phantom for flat panel detector X-ray systems.
    Chida K; Kaga Y; Haga Y; Takeda K; Zuguchi M
    Health Phys; 2013 Jan; 104(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 23192093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [A urological x-ray study table with a 36-cm x-ray image intensifier].
    Melchior H; Lang G
    Urologe A; 1983 Jan; 22(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 6220504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Noise characteristics of a microchannel plate x-ray image intensifier.
    Gould RG; Judy PF; Bjärngard BE
    Med Phys; 1978; 5(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 683149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Large-area contrast of a fiber-optic coupled x-ray image intensifier.
    Davis VL; Glascock HH
    Med Phys; 1977; 4(3):211-4. PubMed ID: 882055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dual-energy cardiac imaging: an image quality and dose comparison for a flat-panel detector and x-ray image intensifier.
    Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):183-96. PubMed ID: 17183135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality control measurements for digital x-ray detectors.
    Marshall NW; Mackenzie A; Honey ID
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Feb; 56(4):979-99. PubMed ID: 21248386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Digital image intensifier radiography--one year's experience with a Polytron system].
    Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M
    Rofo; 1989 Sep; 151(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 2552516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Update on the recommended viewing protocol for FAXIL threshold contrast detail detectability test objects used in television fluoroscopy.
    Launders JH; McArdle S; Workman A; Cowen AR
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Jan; 68(805):70-7. PubMed ID: 7881886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital radiographic imaging system with multiple-slit scanning x-ray beam: preliminary report.
    Doi K; Fujita H; Ohara K; Ono K; Matsui H; Giger ML; Chan HP
    Radiology; 1986 Nov; 161(2):513-8. PubMed ID: 3763924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Objective performance measurements versus perceived image quality in intensified fluoroscopic or photospot images.
    Gould RG; Belanger B; Goldberg HI; Moss A
    Radiology; 1980 Dec; 137(3):783-8. PubMed ID: 7444062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Soft-copy quality control of digital spot images obtained by using X-ray image intensifiers.
    Peter MB; Pavlicek W; Owen JM
    Radiology; 2000 Sep; 216(3):810-9. PubMed ID: 10966716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Physical image quality comparison of four types of digital detector for chest radiology.
    Fernandez JM; Ordiales JM; Guibelalde E; Prieto C; Vano E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):140-3. PubMed ID: 18283060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Image resolution of a microchannel plate x-ray image intensifier.
    Gould RG
    Med Phys; 1978; 5(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 634230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.