These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Resistance to extinction as a function of temporal relations during sensory pre-conditioning. WICKENS DD; CROSS HA J Exp Psychol; 1963 Feb; 65():206-11. PubMed ID: 14000464 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. CUE AND SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT EFFECTS WITH CHILDREN. SIDOWSKI JB; KASS N; WILSON H J Exp Psychol; 1965 Apr; 69():340-2. PubMed ID: 14286301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Resistance to extinction as a function of percentage of reinforcement, number of training trials, and conditioned reinforcement. Kass N; Wilson H J Exp Psychol; 1966 Mar; 71(3):355-7. PubMed ID: 5908814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of a simultaneous conditioning procedure upon subsequent extinction and acquistion. Perlmuter LC; Kimble GA; Leonard TB J Exp Psychol; 1968 Aug; 77(4):648-51. PubMed ID: 5676841 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Partial reinforcement effects in classical aversive conditioning in rabbits and human beings. Leonard DW J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1975 Feb; 88(2):596-608. PubMed ID: 1150940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Unlearning in the A-B, A-C paradigm as a function of percentage occurrence of response members. Keppel G; Zavortink B; Schiff BB J Exp Psychol; 1967 Jun; 74(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 6048452 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. UCS PROPERTIES IN CLASSICAL CONDITIONING OF THE ALBINO RABBIT'S NICTITATING MEMBRANE RESPONSE. BRUNER A J Exp Psychol; 1965 Feb; 69():186-92. PubMed ID: 14279776 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. CONTRAST EFFECTS IN EXTINCTION RESPONDING AS A FUNCTION OF RESPONSE EFFORT DURING CONDITIONING. STACHNIK T J Psychol; 1965 Jul; 60():199-203. PubMed ID: 14326186 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. EXPERIMENTAL EXTINCTION IN LEARNING AND MEMORY. BUNCH ME J Gen Psychol; 1963 Oct; 69():275-91. PubMed ID: 14057089 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Extinction and spontaneous recovery as a function of amount of training and extinction intertrial interval. COLE M; ABRAHAM F J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1962 Dec; 55():978-82. PubMed ID: 14022211 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Frustration considerations of the small-trials partial reinforcement effect: experience with nonreward and intertrial reinforcement. Brooks CI J Exp Psychol; 1971 Aug; 89(2):362-71. PubMed ID: 5567141 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Separate-phase differential eyelid conditioning within the context of a masking procedure. Homzie MJ J Exp Psychol; 1968 Apr; 76(4):630-5. PubMed ID: 5650580 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. VERBAL CONDITIONING: THE EFFECT OF PARTIAL REINFORCEMENT UPON THE RECALL OF EARLY MEMORIES. CRADDICK RA; STERN MR J Abnorm Psychol; 1964 Mar; 68():353-5. PubMed ID: 14126855 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. STIMULUS ASPECTS OF AVERSIVE CONTROLS: THE RETENTION OF CONDITIONED SUPPRESSION. HOFFMAN HS; FLESHLER M; JENSEN P J Exp Anal Behav; 1963 Oct; 6(4):575-83. PubMed ID: 14055956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Performance in eyelid conditioning following changes in reinforcement schedule. RUNQUIST WN J Exp Psychol; 1963 Jun; 65():617-8. PubMed ID: 13975554 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Stimulus generalization of a positive conditioned reinforcer. 3. The new learning method. Caronite SC; Thomas DR J Exp Psychol; 1966 Mar; 71(3):385-8. PubMed ID: 5908820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Facilitation of extinction by an increase or a decrease in trial duration. Haselgrove M; Pearce JM J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2003 Apr; 29(2):153-66. PubMed ID: 12735279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]