85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1393752)
21. Peroperative intravasal electrographic control of catheter tip position in access ports placed by venous cut-down technique.
Stas M; Mulier S; Pattyn P; Vijgen J; De Wever I
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2001 Apr; 27(3):316-20. PubMed ID: 11373111
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The management of arterial and venous injuries during saphenous vein surgery.
Marcucci G; Accrocca F; Antonelli R; Siani A
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2008 May; 7(3):432-3. PubMed ID: 18272543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prospective randomised study of cephalic vein cut-down versus subclavian vein puncture. Technique in the implantation of subcutaneous venous access devices.
D'Angelo FA
Chir Ital; 2003; 55(2):313. PubMed ID: 12744114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. External jugular vein cutdown approach, as a useful alternative, supports the choice of the cephalic vein for totally implantable access device placement.
Di Carlo I; Barbagallo F; Toro A; Sofia M; Lombardo R; Cordio S
Ann Surg Oncol; 2005 Jul; 12(7):570-3. PubMed ID: 15889215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Avoiding complications of long-term venous access.
Henriques HF; Karmy-Jones R; Knoll SM; Copes WS; Giordano JM
Am Surg; 1993 Sep; 59(9):555-8. PubMed ID: 8368659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Vascular complications following intra-aortic balloon pump insertion.
Miller JS; Dodson TF; Salam AA; Smith RB
Am Surg; 1992 Apr; 58(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 1586081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cephalic vein cut-down verses percutaneous access: a retrospective study of complications of implantable venous access devices.
Sarveswaran J; Burke D; Bodenham A
Am J Surg; 2007 Nov; 194(5):699. PubMed ID: 17936440
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Percutaneous innominate vein catheterisation: a new technique for venous access in the critically ill.
Bender JS
Clin Intensive Care; 1991; 2(2):115-8. PubMed ID: 10150045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Arterialization of venous blood flow in the foot in the treatment of severe ischemia in patients with crural arterial occlusions and non-functioning plantar arch].
Pokrovskiĭ AV; Dan VN; Khorovets AG; Chupin AV
Khirurgiia (Mosk); 1990 May; (5):35-42. PubMed ID: 2391935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Intravenous access in the critically ill trauma patient: a multicentered, prospective, randomized trial of saphenous cutdown and percutaneous femoral access.
Westfall MD; Price KR; Lambert M; Himmelman R; Kacey D; Dorevitch S; Mathews J
Ann Emerg Med; 1994 Mar; 23(3):541-5. PubMed ID: 8135430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. External jugular vein cutdown approach for chronic indwelling central venous access in cancer patients: A potentially useful alternative.
Povoski SP
World J Surg Oncol; 2004 Apr; 2():7. PubMed ID: 15090065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Randomized clinical trial comparing venous cutdown with the Seldinger technique for placement of implantable venous access ports.
Nocito A; Wildi S; Rufibach K; Clavien PA; Weber M
Br J Surg; 2009 Oct; 96(10):1129-34. PubMed ID: 19731229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Totally implantable venous access systems. Analysis of complications].
D'Angelo F; Ramacciato G; Caramitti A; Aurello P; Lauro S; Bordin F; Della Casa U
Minerva Chir; 1997; 52(7-8):937-42. PubMed ID: 9411296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Radiological and surgical placement of port devices: a 4-year institutional analysis of procedure performance, quality of life and cost in breast cancer patients.
Marcy PY; Magné N; Castadot P; Bailet C; Macchiavello JC; Namer M; Gallard JC
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2005 Jul; 92(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 15980992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Double reimplantation technique to reconstruct arterial bifurcations with giant aneurysms.
Lawton MT; Quiñones-Hinojosa A
Neurosurgery; 2006 Apr; 58(4 Suppl 2):ONS-347-53; discussion ONS-353-4. PubMed ID: 16582659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Analysis of the survival of permanent vascular access ports].
Rodríguez JA; Ferrer E; Olmos A; Codina S; Borrellas J; Piera L
Nefrologia; 2001; 21(3):260-73. PubMed ID: 11471307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A reevaluation of the radiographically detectable complications of percutaneous venous access lines inserted by four subcutaneous approaches.
Miller JA; Singireddy S; Maldjian P; Baker SR
Am Surg; 1999 Feb; 65(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 9926744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Histological changes of the unligated vein wall adjacent to the central venous catheter after open cutdown in rats.
Kim S; Kim Y; Moon SB
J Pediatr Surg; 2015 Nov; 50(11):1928-32. PubMed ID: 26012741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Peripheral arterial blood pressure monitoring adequately tracks central arterial blood pressure in critically ill patients: an observational study.
Mignini MA; Piacentini E; Dubin A
Crit Care; 2006; 10(2):R43. PubMed ID: 16542489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Insertion of Hickman catheters. A comparison of cutdown and percutaneous techniques.
Davis SJ; Thompson JS; Edney JA
Am Surg; 1984 Dec; 50(12):673-6. PubMed ID: 6508024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
