These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 139521)

  • 1. [Discrimination and critical signal to noise ratio of normal and pathological hearing (author's transl)].
    von Wedel H
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1977 Feb; 56(2):180-6. PubMed ID: 139521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Investigations to monaural and binaural time resolution of short interruptions within a defined signal (author's transl)].
    von Wedel H
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1976 Sep; 55(9):748-55. PubMed ID: 135904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Understanding speech in noise after correction of congenital unilateral aural atresia: effects of age in the emergence of binaural squelch but not in use of head-shadow.
    Gray L; Kesser B; Cole E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 73(9):1281-7. PubMed ID: 19581007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.
    Hagerman B
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Directional hearing and understanding of speech in noise uith "normal hearing" people (author's transl)].
    Platte HJ; Döring WH; Schlöndorff G
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1978 Jul; 57(7):672-80. PubMed ID: 682785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Acoustic and phoniatric investigations in esophageal speech (author's transl)].
    Sáfrán A; Orawetz O; Martikány I
    HNO; 1977 Apr; 25(4):137-9. PubMed ID: 863756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Signal detection and speech perception with level-dependent hearing protectors.
    Abel SM; Krever EM; Giguere C; Alberti PW
    J Otolaryngol; 1991 Feb; 20(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 2030537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of ear protectors on word discrimination in subject with normal hearing and subjects with noise-induced hearing loss.
    Chung DY; Gannon RP
    J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 5(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 511652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Clinical study of speech understanding in noise].
    Tremblay C; Picard M; Barbarosie T; Banville R
    Audiology; 1991; 30(4):212-40. PubMed ID: 1755750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Nose and speech discrimination with specific hearing aid systems (author's transl)].
    Bernath O; Richartz W; Bormann B
    HNO; 1978 Feb; 26(2):73-6. PubMed ID: 632137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Time resolution ability in dichotic hearing experiments (author's transl)].
    von Wedel H
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1978 Nov; 219(2):419-20. PubMed ID: 749877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Speech audiometry with sentences and noise (author's transl)].
    Schultz-Coulon HJ
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1974 Oct; 53(10):734-49. PubMed ID: 4444388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.
    Lin LM; Bowditch S; Anderson MJ; May B; Cox KM; Niparko JK
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development and assessment of two fixed-array microphones for use with hearing aids.
    Bilsen FA; Soede W; Berkhout AJ
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 8263830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of noise-induced hearing-impaired listeners on time-compressed consonant-nucleus-consonant monosyllables.
    Kurdziel SA; Rintelmann WF; Beasley DS
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1975; 1(2):54-60. PubMed ID: 1232075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modified rhyme test and synthetic sentence identification test scores of normal and hearing-impaired subjects listening in multitalker noise.
    Miner R; Danhauer JL
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1976; 2(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 977431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [A simple audiometry test of speech intelligibility in background noise].
    Garin P; Galle C
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2002; 123(4):219-24. PubMed ID: 12723485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech recognition abilities in noise for children with severe-to-profound unilateral hearing impairment.
    Ruscetta MN; Arjmand EM; Pratt SR
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 69(6):771-9. PubMed ID: 15885329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A method to establish the effect of the hearing aid in noise using Victoreen signal threshold and speech discrimination.
    Lindström B; Svärd I; Bredberg G; Lundborg T
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1983; 18():45-55. PubMed ID: 6577574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.