These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1395526)

  • 1. Influence of CRT workstation on observer's performance.
    Itoh Y; Ishigaki T; Sakuma S; Hirose M; Fukatsu H; Itoh S; Horikawa Y; Shimamoto K; Tadokoro T; Ikeda M
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1992 May; 37(4):253-8. PubMed ID: 1395526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of newly developed CRT viewing station: CT reading and observer's performance.
    Hirota H; Shimamoto K; Yamakawa K; Ishigaki T; Takahashi Y; Sugiyama N; Nishihara E; Tani Y
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 1995; 19(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 7641172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CRT diagnosis of pulmonary disease: influence of monitor brightness and room illuminance on observer performance.
    Ishihara S; Shimamoto K; Ikeda M; Kato K; Mori Y; Ishiguchi T; Ishigaki T
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2002; 26(3):181-5. PubMed ID: 11918981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computed radiography and image workstation from the radiologist's point of view.
    Korhola O; Kivisaari A
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1991; 36(2-3):139-41. PubMed ID: 1786684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Display of CT studies on a two-screen electronic workstation versus a film panel alternator: sensitivity and efficiency among radiologists.
    Foley WD; Jacobson DR; Taylor AJ; Goodman LR; Stewart ET; Gurney JW; Stroka D
    Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):769-73. PubMed ID: 2305060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simulated lesion, human observer performance comparison between thin-section dedicated breast CT images versus computed thick-section simulated projection images of the breast.
    Chen L; Boone JM; Abbey CK; Hargreaves J; Bateni C; Lindfors KK; Yang K; Nosratieh A; Hernandez A; Gazi P
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 60(8):3347-58. PubMed ID: 25825980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computed tomography interpretations with a low-cost workstation: a timing study.
    Beard DV; Hemminger BM; Pisano ED; Denelsbeck KM; Warshauer DM; Mauro MA; Keefe B; McCartney WH; Wilcox CB
    J Digit Imaging; 1994 Aug; 7(3):133-9. PubMed ID: 7948172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic usefulness of chest computed radiography--film versus cathode-ray tube images.
    Ishigaki T; Sakuma S; Endo T; Ikeda M
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):25-30. PubMed ID: 7734536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of subtle pulmonary disease on CR chest images: monochromatic CRT monitor vs color CRT monitor.
    Iwano S; Ishigaki T; Shimamoto K; Inamura K; Maeda T; Ikeda M; Ishiguchi T; Kozuka T
    Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 11194919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preliminary time-flow study: comparison of interpretation times between PACS workstations and films.
    Kato H; Kubota G; Kojima K; Hayashi N; Nishihara E; Kura H; Aizawa M
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 1995; 19(3):261-5. PubMed ID: 7641170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Comparison of LCD and CRT monitors for detection of pulmonary nodules and interstitial lung diseases on digital chest radiographs by using receiver operating characteristic analysis].
    Ikeda R; Katsuragawa S; Shimonobou T; Hiai Y; Hashida M; Awai K; Yamashita Y; Doi K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2006 May; 62(5):734-41. PubMed ID: 16733502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Hard-copy (film) versus soft-copy (CRT) reading performance between compressed and uncompressed images: SOLs in abdominal CT images].
    Ando Y; Tsukamoto N; Kawaguchi O; Kitamura M; Kunieda E; Kubo A; Ogasawara K; Kinosada Y; Maeda T; Kozuka T
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1999 Sep; 59(11):521-5. PubMed ID: 10536448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intra- and interobserver agreement and performance score of breast phantom image interpretation: influence of ambient room lighting levels.
    Koyama K; Shimamoto K; Ikeda M; Muramoto H; Satake H; Sawaki A; Kato K; Fukushima H; Ishigaki T
    Nagoya J Med Sci; 2006 Jun; 68(3-4):147-53. PubMed ID: 16967781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of chest image interpretation with conventional, laser-printed, and high-resolution workstation images.
    Slasky BS; Gur D; Good WF; Costa-Greco MA; Harris KM; Cooperstein LA; Rockette HE
    Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):775-80. PubMed ID: 2305061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ROC study of four LCD displays under typical medical center lighting conditions.
    Langer S; Fetterly K; Mandrekar J; Harmsen S; Bartholmai B; Patton C; Bishop A; McCannel C
    J Digit Imaging; 2006 Mar; 19(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 16249836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Performance study of teleradiology network systems with CRT monitors: ROC analysis of an observation study of simulated lung nodules].
    Takizawa M; Sone S; Oguchi K; Maruyama Y; Watanabe T; Gomi K; Wako T; Okazaki Y; Momose M; Imai S; Maruyama A; Sakai F
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1996 Dec; 56(14):1061-5. PubMed ID: 9014469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Quantitative analysis of clinical usefulness of CRT monitor diagnosis by using previous and current chest images with simulated lung nodules].
    Sasaki Y; Katsuragawa S; Yoneda Y; Takeda S; Yanagisawa T
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1996 Apr; 56(5):275-8. PubMed ID: 8692651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Documentation with a digital image workstation].
    Fiebich M; Wiesmann W; Peters PE
    Radiologe; 1994 Jun; 34(6):317-22. PubMed ID: 8090870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interpretation of CT studies: single-screen workstation versus film alternator.
    Beard DV; Hemminger BM; Perry JR; Mauro MA; Muller KE; Warshauer DM; Smith MA; Zito AJ
    Radiology; 1993 May; 187(2):565-9. PubMed ID: 8475309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of full-field digital mammography workstation and conventional picture archiving and communication system in image quality and diagnostic performance.
    Kang BJ; Kim SH; Choi BG
    Clin Imaging; 2011; 35(5):336-40. PubMed ID: 21872121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.