These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13973906)

  • 1. Pitch and loudness transposition in children and adults.
    RILEY DA; McKEE JP
    Child Dev; 1963 Jun; 34():471-82. PubMed ID: 13973906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The interaction of pitch and loudness discriminations.
    HARRIS JD; PIKLER AG; HOFFMAN HS; EHMER RH
    J Exp Psychol; 1958 Sep; 56(3):232-8. PubMed ID: 13575725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An investigation into the ability of voice defectives to discriminate among differences in pitch and loudness.
    EISENSON J; KASTEIN S; SCHNEIDERMAN N
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1958 Nov; 23(5):577-82. PubMed ID: 13588682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ON THE SUMMATION OF PITCH AND LOUDNESS IN AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION OF THE WHITE RAT.
    HYTOENEN Y
    Ann Acad Sci Fenn A; 1964; 106():SUPPL 6:1-9. PubMed ID: 14202155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pitch and loudness matching of unmodulated and modulated stimuli in cochlear implantees.
    Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
    Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 302():32-49. PubMed ID: 23685148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Loudness perception and frequency discrimination in subjects with steeply sloping hearing loss: possible correlates of neural plasticity.
    McDermott HJ; Lech M; Kornblum MS; Irvine DR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Oct; 104(4):2314-25. PubMed ID: 10491696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Response bias in category and magnitude estimation of difference and similarity for loudness and pitch.
    Schneider B; Parker S; Valenti M; Farrell G; Kanow G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1978 Aug; 4(3):483-96. PubMed ID: 681892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Loudness growth in 1/2-octave bands (LGOB)--a procedure for the assessment of loudness.
    Allen JB; Hall JL; Jeng PS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):745-53. PubMed ID: 2212299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relating binaural pitch perception to the individual listener's auditory profile.
    Santurette S; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr; 131(4):2968-86. PubMed ID: 22501074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Handedness and dichotic listening to nonverbal features of speech.
    Nachshon I
    Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Dec; 47(3 Pt 2):1111-4. PubMed ID: 745882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sonic and ultrasonic equal-loudness contours.
    Corso JF; Levine M
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Oct; 70(4):412-6. PubMed ID: 5826030
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On cross-modal similarity: the perceptual structure of pitch, loudness, and brightness.
    Marks LE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Aug; 15(3):586-602. PubMed ID: 2527964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term measurement of binaural intensity and pitch matches. II. Fluctuating low-frequency hearing loss.
    Brännström KJ; Grenner J
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Nov; 47(11):675-87. PubMed ID: 19031226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An auditory Stroop effect for pitch, loudness, and time.
    Morgan AL; Brandt JF
    Brain Lang; 1989 May; 36(4):592-603. PubMed ID: 2720372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perception of periodicity pitch by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Purvis GO; Brandt JF
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1976; 1(6):269-75. PubMed ID: 931763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Complex-Tone Pitch Discrimination in Listeners With Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
    Bianchi F; Fereczkowski M; Zaar J; Santurette S; Dau T
    Trends Hear; 2016 Sep; 20():. PubMed ID: 27604780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of contrast effects in loudness judgments.
    Melamed LE; Thurlow WR
    J Exp Psychol; 1971 Oct; 90(2):268-78. PubMed ID: 5134331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Experimental contribution to vowel discrimination in frequency transposition of the formants].
    Schlöndorff G; Tegtmeier W
    Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1969 Dec; 194(2):466-9. PubMed ID: 5372623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Factors influencing the pitch and loudness of tinnitus].
    Ueda S; Asoh S; Watanabe Y
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1992 Nov; 95(11):1735-43. PubMed ID: 1464790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of bandwidth and stimulus type on most comfortable loudness levels of hearing-impaired listeners.
    Byrne D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Aug; 80(2):484-93. PubMed ID: 3745681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.