These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1397457)

  • 1. Digital subtraction radiography in artificial recurrent caries detection.
    Nummikoski PV; Martinez TS; Matteson SR; McDavid WD; Dove SB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 May; 21(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 1397457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of restorative material and location on the detection of simulated recurrent caries. A comparison of dental film, direct digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography.
    Nair MK; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; May K; Ye F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 9656871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of the accuracy of digital and conventional radiography in the diagnosis of recurrent caries.
    Anbiaee N; Mohassel AR; Imanimoghaddam M; Moazzami SM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Dec; 11(6):E025-32. PubMed ID: 21203734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visibility of artificial buccal recurrent caries under restorations using different radiographic techniques.
    Murat S; Kamburoğlu K; Isayev A; Kurşun S; Yüksel S
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 22917443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital subtraction radiography after stannous fluoride treatment for occlusal caries diagnosis.
    Wenzel A; Halse A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Dec; 74(6):824-8. PubMed ID: 1488242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiopacity of restorations and detection of secondary caries.
    Espelid I; Tveit AB; Erickson RL; Keck SC; Glasspoole EA
    Dent Mater; 1991 Apr; 7(2):114-7. PubMed ID: 1936639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic accuracy of intraoral film and direct digital images for detection of simulated recurrent decay.
    Nair MK; Ludlow JB; May KN; Nair UP; Johnson MP; Close JM
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 11357563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tuned aperture computed tomography and detection of recurrent caries.
    Nair MK; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; May K
    Caries Res; 1998; 32(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 9438568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of Image Filters and Variation in Horizontal Angle of Incidence of X-ray Beam in Digital Interproximal Radiographs for Diagnosis of Secondary Caries in Esthetic Restorations.
    Deprá Lde C; Vessoni Iwaki LC; Chicarelli M; Takeshita WM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Oct; 16(10):805-12. PubMed ID: 26581461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors determining the diagnostic accuracy of digitized conventional intraoral radiographs.
    Ohki M; Okano T; Nakamura T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 May; 23(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 7835507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical validation of a new subtraction radiography technique for periodontal bone loss detection.
    Nummikoski PV; Steffensen B; Hamilton K; Dove SB
    J Periodontol; 2000 Apr; 71(4):598-605. PubMed ID: 10807124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reproducibility in the assessment of caries lesion behaviour: a comparison between conventional film and subtraction radiography.
    Wenzel A; Anthonisen PN; Juul MB
    Caries Res; 2000; 34(3):214-8. PubMed ID: 10867419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Secondary caries detection by DIAGNOdent and radiography: a comparative in vitro study.
    Bamzahim M; Shi XQ; Angmar-Månsson B
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2004 Feb; 62(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 15124784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Intraoral Radiography in Detection of Recurrent Caries under Composite Restorations.
    Kasraei S; Shokri A; Poorolajal J; Khajeh S; Rahmani H
    Braz Dent J; 2017; 28(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 28301024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy and reproducibility of conventional radiographic assessment and subtraction radiography in detecting demineralization in occlusal surfaces.
    Ricketts DN; Ekstrand KR; Martignon S; Ellwood R; Alatsaris M; Nugent Z
    Caries Res; 2007; 41(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 17284913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of lesion size, restorative material, and film speed on the detection of recurrent caries.
    Matteson SR; Phillips C; Kantor ML; Leinedecker T
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Aug; 68(2):232-7. PubMed ID: 2674831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of enamel demineralization using conventional, digital, and digitized radiography.
    Ferreira RI; Haiter-Neto F; Tabchoury CP; de Paiva GA; Bóscolo FN
    Braz Oral Res; 2006; 20(2):114-9. PubMed ID: 16878203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of cone beam computed tomography and digital intraoral radiography performance in the detection of artificially induced recurrent caries-like lesions.
    Sousa Melo SL; Belem MDF; Prieto LT; Tabchoury CPM; Haiter-Neto F
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Sep; 124(3):306-314. PubMed ID: 28690085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computer-assisted subtraction radiography in periodontal diagnosis.
    Gröndahl K
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1987; 50():1-44. PubMed ID: 3321498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection of mineral loss in approximal enamel by subtraction radiography.
    Halse A; Espelid I; Tveit AB; White SC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Feb; 77(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 8139837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.