76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1397460)
21. Effects of aluminum-copper alloy filtration on photon spectra, air kerma rate and image contrast.
Gonçalves A; Rollo JM; Gonçalves M; Haiter Neto F; Bóscolo FN
Braz Dent J; 2004; 15(3):214-9. PubMed ID: 15798826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Factors affecting x-ray spectra.
Nickoloff EL; Berman HL
Radiographics; 1993 Nov; 13(6):1337-48. PubMed ID: 8290728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of beam energy and filtration on the signal-to-noise ratio of the Dexis intraoral X-ray detector.
Kitagawa H; Farman AG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 15140818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Niobium/aluminum filters reduce patient exposure.
Burns CB; Renner JB; Gratale P; Moyle LL
Radiol Technol; 1992; 63(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 1736315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Niobium filter v. an aluminum filter.
Stirling GC; Holloway AF
Ont Dent; 1990; 67(6):18-22. PubMed ID: 2094828
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Skin exposure and thyroid dose distribution using niobium filtration.
Byrne CM; Pharoah MJ; Wood RE
J Can Dent Assoc; 1991 Aug; 57(8):663-5. PubMed ID: 1889018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Niobium filter v. an aluminum filter.
Stirling GC; Holloway AF
Ont Dent; 1990 Oct; 67(8):25-7, 29-30. PubMed ID: 2280962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Does the use of additional X-ray beam filtration during cine acquisition reduce clinical image quality and effective dose in cardiac interventional imaging?
Davies AG; Gislason-Lee AJ; Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Lupton M; Moore J; Sivananthan M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Dec; 162(4):597-604. PubMed ID: 24563525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of aluminum-yttrium filtration for intraoral radiography.
Farman AG; Perez C; Jacobson A; Kelly MS
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Feb; 67(2):224-6. PubMed ID: 2919069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Chest radiography with a flat-panel detector: image quality with dose reduction after copper filtration.
Hamer OW; Sirlin CB; Strotzer M; Borisch I; Zorger N; Feuerbach S; Völk M
Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):691-700. PubMed ID: 16192324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [The use of copper and niobium filters in diagnostic x-ray equipment. A comparison of dose reduction, tube loading and picture quality].
Thorsen F; Mehus A; Nordanger J
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1990 Sep; 110(22):2878-80. PubMed ID: 2219065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Psychophysical properties of a new F-speed intraoral film.
Mastoris M; Yoshiura K; Welander U; Tsiklakis K; Papadakis E; Li G
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 May; 33(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 15371315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Salvaging dark dental radiographs.
Winstanley TD
Dent Update; 1996; 23(6):246, 249. PubMed ID: 9084254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Radiographic digital image enhancement. Part II: transform domain techniques.
Analoui M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Mar; 30(2):65-77. PubMed ID: 11313724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [NIOBI-X filter: reduction of patient exposure and effect on image quality].
Rozza M; Campoleoni M; Landini A; Orsini S
Radiol Med; 1990 Nov; 80(5):740-4. PubMed ID: 2267397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Dose and exposure reduction in endodontic radiology through the use of new filters].
Gigola P; Marcoli PA; Cordone L
G Ital Endod; 1990; 4(4):26-8. PubMed ID: 2133816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of bit depth and kVp of digital radiography for detection of subtle differences.
Heo MS; Choi DH; Benavides E; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Lee SS; Choi SC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):278-83. PubMed ID: 19272812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A preliminary report: Niobium filter for dental X-ray systems.
Pettigrew JC; Collett WK
Fla Dent J; 1989; 60(2):40-2. PubMed ID: 2630320
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. In vitro perception of low-contrast features in digital, film, and digitized dental radiographs: a receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Grassl U; Schulze RK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 May; 103(5):694-701. PubMed ID: 17466887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effects of varying peak kilovoltage and filtration on diagnostic dental radiographs.
Oishi TT; Parfitt GJ
Dent J; 1976 Sep; 42(9):449-52. PubMed ID: 1067261
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
