These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1397469)

  • 1. Recognizing invariant geometric structure in dental radiographs.
    Dunn SM; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 Aug; 21(3):142-7. PubMed ID: 1397469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of two registration techniques for digital subtraction radiography.
    Dunn SM; van der Stelt PF; Ponce A; Fenesy K; Shah S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 May; 22(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 8375559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Registration of dental radiographs using projective geometry.
    Ostuni J; Fisher E; van der Stelt P; Dunn S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Nov; 22(4):199-203. PubMed ID: 8181647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A method for the geometric and densitometric standardization of intraoral radiographs.
    Duckworth JE; Judy PF; Goodson JM; Socransky SS
    J Periodontol; 1983 Jul; 54(7):435-40. PubMed ID: 6577180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiographic methods in the evaluation of periodontal therapy.
    Reddy MS
    J Periodontol; 1992 Dec; 63(12 Suppl):1078-84. PubMed ID: 1479529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Synthesizing dental radiographs for human identification.
    Tohnak S; Mehnert AJ; Mahoney M; Crozier S
    J Dent Res; 2007 Nov; 86(11):1057-62. PubMed ID: 17959896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new method for the automated alignment of dental radiographs for digital subtraction radiography.
    Yoon DC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 10654031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of independent film and object rotation on projective geometric standardization of dental radiographs.
    Fisher E; van der Stelt PF; Ostuni J; Dunn SM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 8593908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A benchmark for comparison of dental radiography analysis algorithms.
    Wang CW; Huang CT; Lee JH; Li CH; Chang SW; Siao MJ; Lai TM; Ibragimov B; Vrtovec T; Ronneberger O; Fischer P; Cootes TF; Lindner C
    Med Image Anal; 2016 Jul; 31():63-76. PubMed ID: 26974042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Image quality of conventional radiographs and their digital counterparts.
    Peretz B
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2006 Jul; 24(3):96. PubMed ID: 17091627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of cephalometric landmarks on monitor-displayed radiographs with and without image emboss enhancement.
    Leonardi RM; Giordano D; Maiorana F; Greco M
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 20022892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiographic diagnosis of periodontal disease progression.
    Brägger I
    Curr Opin Periodontol; 1996; 3():59-67. PubMed ID: 8624570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computer-based registration for digital subtraction in dental radiology.
    Lehmann TM; Gröndahl HG; Benn DK
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Nov; 29(6):323-46. PubMed ID: 11114663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Aspects of quality in intra- and extraoral radiographs].
    Sonnabend E; Benz C
    Zahnarztl Mitt; 1987 May; 77(9):954, 956-7. PubMed ID: 3475879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiographic modalities for diagnosis and treatment planning in implant dentistry.
    Garg AK; Vicari A
    Implant Soc; 1995; 5(5):7-11. PubMed ID: 9571835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Right angle dental radiography described, simplified, and standardized (part I).
    Updegrave WJ
    Compend Contin Educ Dent (Lawrenceville); 1981; 2(6):379-84. PubMed ID: 6950872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Salvaging dark dental radiographs.
    Winstanley TD
    Dent Update; 1996; 23(6):246, 249. PubMed ID: 9084254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improved diagnosis with digital radiography.
    van der Stelt PF
    Curr Opin Dent; 1992 Dec; 2():1-6. PubMed ID: 1298452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of in-vivo-occurring errors in the reproducibility of radiographs on the use of the subtraction technique.
    Janssen PT; van Palenstein Helderman WH; van Aken J
    J Clin Periodontol; 1989 Jan; 16(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 2644313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Research methods in dentistry. 8. Methods for longitudinally detecting differences in bone density: digital subtraction radiography].
    van der Stelt PF
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2005 Feb; 112(2):46-50. PubMed ID: 15747997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.