These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
25. Lead foil in the intraoral periapical radiograph as an inclusion agent: a simple method in denture identification. Shamim T J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2012 Feb; 22(2):130-1. PubMed ID: 22313659 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Quality Assurance Audit Of Intra-Oral Periapical Radiographs At The Undergraduate Dental School. Khan A; Javed MQ; Iqbal R; Khan F; Habib SR J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2020; 32(3):327-330. PubMed ID: 32829545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Quality of intraoral radiographs sent by private dental practitioners for therapy evaluation by the Social Insurance Office. Eliasson S; Lavstedt S; Wouters F; Ostlin L Swed Dent J; 1990; 14(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 2374996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Mistakes and errors in the analysis and interpretation of the intraoral radiograph in tooth preserving and periodontal procedures]. Schübel F Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1974 Mar; 29(3):312-6. PubMed ID: 4524539 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Time-related changes of in vivo projection errors in standardized radiographs. Zappa U; Simona C; Graf H; van Aken J J Periodontol; 1993 Apr; 64(4):278-84. PubMed ID: 8483090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Investigation into the relationship between deviations in X-ray angulation and images of proximal overlapping on bite-wing radiographs. McDonald SP Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1984 Jun; 12(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 6589108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The occlusal radiograph revisited. Tai CC; Miller PA; Packota GV; Wood RE Oral Health; 1994 Nov; 84(11):47-50, 53. PubMed ID: 8779751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The effects of beam quality and optical density on image quality in dental radiography. Price C Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Nov; 62(5):580-8. PubMed ID: 3466130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Applying synthetic radiography to intraoral tomosynthesis: a step towards achieving 3D imaging in the dental clinic. Puett C; Inscoe CR; Hilton RL; Regan Anderson MW; Perrone L; Puett S; Gaalaas LR; Platin E; Lu J; Zhou O Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 Feb; 50(2):20200159. PubMed ID: 32666823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Light source-induced error in computer-assisted image analysis with a video-based system. Stutz FA; Hefti AF; Gibbs CH Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Apr; 81(4):491-7. PubMed ID: 8705599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [The dental radiograph: pitfalls and surprises]. Bakx S; Syriopoulos K Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2015 May; 122(5):280-5. PubMed ID: 26210220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Digital radiology in dental diagnosis: a critical view. Gröndahl HG Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 Nov; 21(4):198-202. PubMed ID: 1299634 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Digital radiology. Friedman LA J Am Dent Assoc; 1994 Mar; 125(3):246, 248. PubMed ID: 8157836 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Assessment of the reliability of radiographic diagnosis in a clinical caries trial. de Paola PF; Alman J J Dent Res; 1972; 51(5):1431-7. PubMed ID: 4506569 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]