These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. MULTIDIMENSIONAL STIMULUS DIFFERENCES IN DISCRIMINATION LEARNING AND VERBALIZATION OF THE REINFORCEMENT CONTINGENCY. MARTIN RB; DEAN SJ Psychol Rep; 1965 Feb; 16():235-40. PubMed ID: 14283969 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Lever displacement during continuous reinforcement and during a discrimination. HERRICK RM J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1963 Aug; 56():700-7. PubMed ID: 13954070 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. REINFORCEMENT IN DISCRIMINATION LEARNING: WITH SPECIAL ATTENTION TO THE EFFECTS OF DELAYED REINFORCEMENT. TERRELL G J Genet Psychol; 1964 Jun; 104():225-33. PubMed ID: 14158005 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A TEST OF A DISCRIMINATION HYPOTHESIS OF SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT. MYERS NA; MYERS JL J Exp Psychol; 1965 Jul; 70():98-101. PubMed ID: 14315138 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Discrimination learning as a function of the probability of reinforcement. NORTH AJ; McDONALD RD J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1959 Jun; 52(3):342-4. PubMed ID: 13673122 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. DISCRIMINATION BASED ON SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT. FORT JG Child Dev; 1965 Jun; 36():481-90. PubMed ID: 14300867 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. EFFECTS OF OVERLEARNING AND SPATIAL DELAY OF REINFORCEMENT UPON A DISCRIMINATION REVERSAL. PAUL C; HAVLENA J Psychol Rep; 1965 Feb; 16():79-83. PubMed ID: 14284004 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of different stimulus frequencies on discrimination learning with probabilistic reinforcement. SHAFFER JP J Exp Psychol; 1963 Mar; 65():265-9. PubMed ID: 13988332 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. VERBAL DISCRIMINATION PERFORMANCE UNDER DIFFERENT VERBAL REINFORCEMENT COMBINATIONS. SPENCE JT J Exp Psychol; 1964 Feb; 67():195-7. PubMed ID: 14114920 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Number of common elements and consistency of reinforcement in a discrimination learning task. FRENCH RS J Exp Psychol; 1953 Jan; 45(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 13034998 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. EFFECT OF SPATIAL SEPARATION OF STIMULUS, RESPONSE, AND REINFORCEMENT ON SELECTIVE LEARNING IN CHILDREN. JEFFREY WE; COHEN LB J Exp Psychol; 1964 Jun; 67():577-80. PubMed ID: 14155421 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Sound discrimination as a function of pretraining conditions. WINITZ H; BELLEROSE B J Speech Hear Res; 1962 Dec; 5():340-8. PubMed ID: 14001172 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Schedules of reinforcement and discrimination learning. GREEN EJ; SANDERS RM; SQUIER RW J Exp Anal Behav; 1959 Oct; 2(4):293-9. PubMed ID: 13851480 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. DISCRIMINATION LEARNING AS A FUNCTION OF PRIOR RELEVANCE OF A PARTIALLY REINFORCED DIMENSION. ABRAHAM F; GORMEZANO I; WIEHE R J Exp Psychol; 1964 Mar; 67():242-9. PubMed ID: 14129724 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of differential goal boxes on discrimination learning involving delay of reinforcement. LAWRENCE D; HOMMEL L J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1961 Oct; 54():552-5. PubMed ID: 14462982 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]