These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1398259)

  • 1. [Importance of MR-mammography. Satellite symposium following the 73rd German Radiology Congress. Wiesbaden, 17 May 1992].
    Gynakologe; 1992 Aug; 25(4 Suppl):1-15. PubMed ID: 1398259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Importance of MR-mammography. Satellite symposium following the 73rd German Radiology Congress. Wiesbaden, 27 May 1992].
    Radiologe; 1992 Aug; 32(8 Suppl):1-15. PubMed ID: 1410330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 1st International Congress on MR Mammography. Jena, Germany, 29-31 May 1997. Abstracts.
    Eur Radiol; 1997; 7(4):605-24. PubMed ID: 9244637
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Abstracts of the Fifth International Congress on MR-Mammography. September 24-26, 2009. Jena, Germany.
    Eur Radiol; 2009 Sep; 19 Suppl 4():S765-974. PubMed ID: 19760242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Abstracts of the 4th International Congress on MR-Mammography, 28-30 September 2006, Jena, Germany.
    Eur Radiol; 2006 Sep; 16 Suppl 5():E1-110. PubMed ID: 17380569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 2nd International Congress on MR Mammography. 21-23 September 2000. Jena, Germany. Abstracts.
    Eur Radiol; 2000; 10(9):F1-56. PubMed ID: 11188985
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of BI-RADS category 4 lesions detected with screening mammography and screening US: utility of MR imaging.
    Strobel K; Schrading S; Hansen NL; Barabasch A; Kuhl CK
    Radiology; 2015 Feb; 274(2):343-51. PubMed ID: 25271857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MR Imaging as an Additional Screening Modality for the Detection of Breast Cancer in Women Aged 50-75 Years with Extremely Dense Breasts: The DENSE Trial Study Design.
    Emaus MJ; Bakker MF; Peeters PH; Loo CE; Mann RM; de Jong MD; Bisschops RH; Veltman J; Duvivier KM; Lobbes MB; Pijnappel RM; Karssemeijer N; de Koning HJ; van den Bosch MA; Monninkhof EM; Mali WP; Veldhuis WB; van Gils CH
    Radiology; 2015 Nov; 277(2):527-37. PubMed ID: 26110667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value?
    Uematsu T; Yuen S; Kasami M; Uchida Y
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jul; 103(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 17063274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Screening breast MR imaging in women with a history of chest irradiation.
    Sung JS; Lee CH; Morris EA; Oeffinger KC; Dershaw DD
    Radiology; 2011 Apr; 259(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 21325032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast imaging.
    D'Orsi CJ; Adler DD; Ikeda DM; Mendelson EB; Monsees BS; Newstead GM; Stelling CB
    Radiology; 1994 Mar; 190(3):936-8. PubMed ID: 8115659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
    Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [MR-mammography: current status and perspectives].
    Funke M; Fischer U; Grabbe E
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1996 May; 6(3):130-5. PubMed ID: 8679736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Typical and unusual findings in MR mammography].
    Bick U
    Rofo; 2000 May; 172(5):415-28. PubMed ID: 10874968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Controversies in breast MRI.
    Weinreb JC; Newstead G
    Magn Reson Q; 1994 Jun; 10(2):67-83. PubMed ID: 7986702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Significance of MR-mammography for evaluation of the tumor and adjacent tissue].
    Büttner A; Bauer M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Grebmeier H; Tulusan HA; Lang N
    Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 1993; 33 Suppl 1():229-30. PubMed ID: 8118285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Effect of MR mammography on surgical procedure in operative treatment of breast cancer].
    Gatzemeier W; Liersch T; Stylianou A; Buttler A; Fischer U; Becker H
    Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd; 1998; 115():1488-90. PubMed ID: 9931920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Preoperative MR-mammography in diagnosed breast carcinoma. Useful information or useless extravagance?].
    Fischer U; Vosshenrich R; Probst A; Burchhardt H; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 1994 Oct; 161(4):300-6. PubMed ID: 7948975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Breast cancer screening and problem solving using mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Hooley RJ; Andrejeva L; Scoutt LM
    Ultrasound Q; 2011 Mar; 27(1):23-47. PubMed ID: 21343800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preoperative assessment of breast cancer: sonography versus MR imaging.
    Hlawatsch A; Teifke A; Schmidt M; Thelen M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Dec; 179(6):1493-501. PubMed ID: 12438043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.