These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13986324)
1. Recruitment, latency, magnitude, and amplitude of the GSR as a function of interstimulus interval. PROKASY WF; FAWCETT JT; HALL JF J Exp Psychol; 1962 Nov; 64():513-8. PubMed ID: 13986324 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Differential GSR conditioning as a function of the CS-UCS interval. KIMMEL HD; PENNYPACKER HS J Exp Psychol; 1963 Jun; 65():559-63. PubMed ID: 14032730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Latency and magnitude of GSR as a function of interstimulus interval. Wittig AF; Wickens DD J Exp Psychol; 1966 Mar; 71(3):466-7. PubMed ID: 5908832 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A replication of operant conditioning of the GSR. KIMMEL E; KIMMEL HD J Exp Psychol; 1963 Feb; 65():212-3. PubMed ID: 14032729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. GSR conditioning with long interstimulus intervals. Morrow MC; Keough TE J Exp Psychol; 1968 Jul; 77(3):460-7. PubMed ID: 5665578 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. EXTRAVERSION AND THE ACQUISITION OF EYEBLINK AND GSR CONDITIONED RESPONSES. EYSENCK HJ Psychol Bull; 1965 Apr; 63():258-70. PubMed ID: 14320742 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Second interval discrimination conditioning of the GSR as a function of UCS intensity and trace and delay conditioning paradigms. Zeiner AR J Exp Psychol; 1968 Oct; 78(2):276-80. PubMed ID: 5722441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Cognition and conditioning: effects of masking the CS-UCS contingency on human GSR classical conditioning. Dawson ME J Exp Psychol; 1970 Sep; 85(3):389-96. PubMed ID: 5489485 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. BACKWARD CONDITIONING AND UCR LATENCY. TRAPOLD MA; HOMZIE M; RUTLEDGE E J Exp Psychol; 1964 Apr; 67():387-91. PubMed ID: 14165654 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Learning and performance as a function of CS-intensity in a delayed GSR conditioning situation. Orlebeke JF; van Olst EH J Exp Psychol; 1968 Jul; 77(3):483-7. PubMed ID: 5665582 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of facilitory and inhibitory sets on GSR conditioning and extinction. Dawson ME; Reardon P J Exp Psychol; 1969 Dec; 82(3):462-6. PubMed ID: 5378225 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of explicit trial-by-trial information about shock probability in long interstimulus interval GSR conditioning. Ohman A; Björkstrand PA; Ellström PE J Exp Psychol; 1973 Apr; 98(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 4704205 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comments regarding multiple response phenomena in long interstimulus interval conditioning. Lockhart RA Psychophysiology; 1966 Oct; 3(2):108-14. PubMed ID: 5927826 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Transfer of the conditioned GSR from drug to nondrug state without awareness. Gruber RP; Reed DR; Block JD J Psychol; 1968 Nov; 70(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 5727449 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Cognitive processes in differential GSR conditioning: effects of a masking task. Fuhrer MJ; Baer PE Am J Psychol; 1969 Jun; 82(2):168-80. PubMed ID: 5811180 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurements of a single galvanic skin response based upon its rate topography. Hunt DP J Gen Psychol; 1975 Oct; 93(2d Half):155-71. PubMed ID: 1194905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Human GSR pseudoconditioning as a function of change in basal skin resistance and CS-US similarity. Hammond LJ J Exp Psychol; 1967 Jan; 73(1):125-9. PubMed ID: 6031652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]