These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13987033)

  • 21. Increased review responsibilities for Australian institutional ethics committees.
    Darvall L
    IRB; 1995; 17(1):9. PubMed ID: 11653062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. INVESTIGATIONAL DRUG REGULATIONS AND CLINICAL RESEARCH.
    GIBSON ML
    J Oral Ther Pharmacol; 1964 Jul; 1():93-8. PubMed ID: 14204421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Equitable access to biomedical advances: getting beyond the rights impasse.
    Mariner WK
    Conn Law Rev; 1989; 21(3):571-603. PubMed ID: 11650430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The food and Drug Administration's view of investigational drugs.
    MEYERS EL
    SD J Med Pharm; 1963 Jul; 16():40-6. PubMed ID: 13935340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The High Court of the Hague Case No. 79065, October 21, 1986.
    Bostrom BA; Lagerwey W
    Issues Law Med; 1988; 3(4):445-50. PubMed ID: 11644314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Patient confidentiality in a high tech world.
    Berger J
    J Pharm Law; 1996; 5(1):139-45. PubMed ID: 11657422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Proving ground for tomorrow's drugs.
    HUNT MM; WOLTERS D
    Sci Illus; 1948 Aug; 3(8):17-23. PubMed ID: 18880995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Should doctors help execute prisoners?
    Capron AM
    Washington Post; 1984 Dec; ():A23. PubMed ID: 11646221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The use of investigational drugs in hospitals; a survey. I.
    TEPLITSKY B
    Hosp Prog; 1956 Aug; 37(8):76-82. PubMed ID: 13345319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Problems relating to investigational drugs.
    KELSEY FO
    J New Drugs; 1963; 3():71-4. PubMed ID: 14031846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. If a subject incurs obligations and carries them out, then consent is a contract: Dahl v. HEM Pharmaceuticals (Part II).
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1996 Jan; 11(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 11653221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The use of investigational drugs in hospitals; a survey. II.
    TEPLITSKY B
    Hosp Prog; 1956 Sep; 37(9):106; passim. PubMed ID: 13357155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Researchers and subpoenas: the troubling precedent of the Selikoff case.
    Holder AR
    IRB; 1989; 11(6):8-10. PubMed ID: 11650287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prison for fraud.
    David P
    Nature; 1984 Apr 19-25; 308(5961):680. PubMed ID: 6717562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The legal and ethical considerations of clinical research.
    Addison PH
    Med Leg J; 1972; 40(4):144-51. PubMed ID: 4566128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Ethics consultation: cases in context.
    Winslade WJ
    Albany Law Rev; 1994; 57(3):679-91. PubMed ID: 11652860
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. MALPRACTICE AND ASSAULT AND THE DRUG AMENDMENTS OF 1962.
    LEVIN M
    Mil Med; 1964 Nov; 129():1036-9. PubMed ID: 14200846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Final rule on research with children as subjects.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jan; 14(1):3. PubMed ID: 11657558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. UK judge approves death free from mental pain.
    Brahams D
    Lancet; 1997 Nov; 350(9088):1376. PubMed ID: 11660436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mengele's birthmark: the Nuremberg Code in United States courts.
    Annas GJ
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1991; 7():17-45. PubMed ID: 11645690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.