These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13993915)

  • 21. Eyetracking and selective attention in category learning.
    Rehder B; Hoffman AB
    Cogn Psychol; 2005 Aug; 51(1):1-41. PubMed ID: 16039934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The oddity preference effect and the concept of difference in pigeons.
    Daniel TA; Wright AA; Katz JS
    Learn Behav; 2016 Dec; 44(4):320-328. PubMed ID: 27059232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. PROMPTED VS TRIAL-AND-ERROR CONCEPT DISCRIMINATION LEARNING IN MONKEYS.
    FLETCHER HJ; TAKEMURA KI
    Percept Mot Skills; 1965 Jun; 20():737-43. PubMed ID: 14313984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. IGNORING IRRELEVANT INFORMATION.
    RABBITT PM
    Br J Psychol; 1964 Nov; 55():403-14. PubMed ID: 14237881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Contextual control of stimulus generalization and stimulus equivalence in hierarchical categorization.
    Griffee K; Dougher MJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Nov; 78(3):433-47. PubMed ID: 12507013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. THE ROLE OF CONCEPTUAL ORGANIZATION IN INTERPERSONAL DISCRIMINATION.
    CARR JE
    J Psychol; 1965 Jan; 59():159-76. PubMed ID: 14244135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Object identification in the hierarchy of artificial concept].
    Hoffmann J; Ziessler C
    Z Psychol Z Angew Psychol; 1983; 191(2):135-67. PubMed ID: 6137912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Generality of perceptual biases in inference and concept usage.
    Scholnick EK
    Child Dev; 1971 Dec; 42(6):1937-49. PubMed ID: 5146023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Concept learning without differential reinforcement in pigeons by means of contextual cueing.
    Couto KC; Navarro VM; Smith TR; Wasserman EA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2016 Apr; 42(2):221-227. PubMed ID: 26914972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Functional relationships.
    Katz JS; Crystal JD
    Behav Processes; 2013 Feb; 93():1-3. PubMed ID: 23353725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Why are artificial polymorphous concepts so hard for birds to learn?
    Lea SE; Wills AJ; Ryan CM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Feb; 59(2):251-67. PubMed ID: 16618633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Generalization hypothesis of abstract-concept learning: learning strategies and related issues in Macaca mulatta, Cebus apella, and Columba livia.
    Wright AA; Katz JS
    J Comp Psychol; 2007 Nov; 121(4):387-97. PubMed ID: 18085922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mechanisms of same/different concept learning in primates and avians.
    Wright AA; Katz JS
    Behav Processes; 2006 Jun; 72(3):234-54. PubMed ID: 16621333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Latency-choice discrepancy in concept learning.
    Levine M
    J Exp Psychol; 1969 Oct; 82(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 5371994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A new type of concept learning situation.
    Goldstein M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1966 Feb; 22(1):233-4. PubMed ID: 5906723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Relational concept learning in domestic dogs: Performance on a two-choice size discrimination task generalises to novel stimuli.
    Byosiere SE; Feng LC; Chouinard PA; Howell TJ; Bennett PC
    Behav Processes; 2017 Dec; 145():93-101. PubMed ID: 29056526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effects of type and amount of pretraining on transfer in concept formation.
    Schroth ML
    J Gen Psychol; 2000 Jul; 127(3):261-9. PubMed ID: 10975425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Stages in concept learning. III.
    Stenild M
    Scand J Psychol; 1975; 16(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 1138343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Discrimination of artificial categories structured by family resemblances: a comparative study in people (Homo sapiens) and pigeons (Columba livia).
    Makino H; Jitsumori M
    J Comp Psychol; 2007 Feb; 121(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 17324072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. What does it look like and what can it do? Category structure influences how infants categorize.
    Horst JS; Oakes LM; Madole KL
    Child Dev; 2005; 76(3):614-31. PubMed ID: 15892782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.