These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1399592)

  • 1. Evaluating user satisfaction in a hospital environment: an exploratory study.
    Zviran M
    Health Care Manage Rev; 1992; 17(3):51-62. PubMed ID: 1399592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of user acceptance of information systems in health care--the value of questionnaires.
    Ammenwerth E; Kaiser F; Wilhelmy I; Höfer S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2003; 95():643-8. PubMed ID: 14664060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. $1.6 billion CHCS (Composite Health Care System) project flayed by experts.
    Hassig J
    Healthc Inform; 1992 Nov; 9(11):72, 74, 76. PubMed ID: 10122401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A study of users' perceptions on the benefits of information systems in hospitals.
    Chin L; Haughton DM
    Healthc Inf Manage; 1995; 9(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 10153775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When usage and user satisfaction differ: the case of an electronic discharge summary.
    Bürkle T; Engel PA
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 129(Pt 2):1093-7. PubMed ID: 17911884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Systematic evaluation of user satisfaction of physicians with a hospital information system--initial results].
    Boy O; Ohmann C; Aust B; Eich HP; Koller M; Knode O; Nolte U
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 77():518-22. PubMed ID: 11187607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An online user satisfaction survey.
    Minard B
    Comput Healthc; 1989 Jan; 10(1):54-6. PubMed ID: 10291194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nurses' views on the use, quality and user satisfaction with electronic medical records: questionnaire development.
    Otieno OG; Toyama H; Asonuma M; Kanai-Pak M; Naitoh K
    J Adv Nurs; 2007 Oct; 60(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 17877568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Study of user preference of graphic user interface in laboratory information system.
    Kwak YS; Jeon HS; Choi YS; Cho H
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1998; 52 Pt 2():904-6. PubMed ID: 10384590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing physician's expectations and attitudes toward hospital information systems. The IMASIS experience.
    Martin-Baranera M; Planas I; Palau J; Miralles M; Sancho JJ; Sanz F
    MD Comput; 1999; 16(1):73-6. PubMed ID: 10202428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [User satisfaction with patient data management systems (PDMS) in intensive care medicine].
    Junger A; Benson M; Quinzio L; Fuchs C; Michel A; Marquardt K; Hempelmann G
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 77():513-7. PubMed ID: 11187606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Survey: CEOs cite flaws in departmental IS.
    Hard R
    Hospitals; 1992 Mar; 66(5):52, 54. PubMed ID: 1740290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measuring physician satisfaction with radiology services.
    Nielsen GA
    Radiol Manage; 1992; 14(2):43-9. PubMed ID: 10119017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigating changes in end-user satisfaction with installation of an electronic medical record in ambulatory care settings.
    Gamm LD; Barsukiewicz CK; Dansky KH; Vasey JJ
    J Healthc Inf Manag; 1998; 12(4):53-65. PubMed ID: 10345834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing user satisfaction and hospital pharmacy practice: application to an individualized dispensing system in a French military teaching hospital.
    Dussart C; Dussart S; Almeras D; Camal I; Grelaud G
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Apr; 15(2):252-6. PubMed ID: 19335481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. SDR 1992 Vendor Awards of Excellence. How hospital users rate application software.
    Packer CL
    Hospitals; 1992 Jul; 66(14):50, 52-4. PubMed ID: 1634217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Results of the Office of Policy's 2001 User Satisfaction Survey.
    Waldron H
    Soc Secur Bull; 2001-2002; 64(4):33-47. PubMed ID: 12822191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Data quality in hospital strategic information systems: a summary of survey findings.
    Bean KP
    Top Health Inf Manage; 1994 Nov; 15(2):13-25. PubMed ID: 10138524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spreading the clinical information system: which users are satisfied?
    Mazzoleni MC; Baiardi P; Giorgi I; Franchi G; Marconi R; Cortesi M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1997; 43 Pt A():162-6. PubMed ID: 10179529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An EHR user-satisfaction survey: advice from 408 family physicians.
    Edsall RL; Adler KG
    Fam Pract Manag; 2005 Oct; 12(9):29-35. PubMed ID: 16296595
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.