These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1399592)

  • 21. Evaluation of OLD@HOME virtual health record staff opinions of the system and satisfaction with work.
    Engström M; Scandurra I; Ljunggren B; Lindqvist R; Koch S; Carlsson M
    Telemed J E Health; 2009 Jan; 15(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 19199848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Towards responsive IT-infrastructures--assessment of a health information system.
    Blaser R; Kuhn KA; Overath M; Dietz F; Opitz E; Lenz R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 2):1178-82. PubMed ID: 15360998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The power distance between users of information technology and experts and satisfaction with the information system: implication for cross cultural transfer of IT.
    Isaacs S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 2):1155-7. PubMed ID: 11604910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. User needs and demands of a computer-based patient record.
    Dumont R; van der Loo R; van Merode F; Tange H
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1998; 52 Pt 1():64-9. PubMed ID: 10384421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Self-reported consumer satisfaction in mental health services: validation of a self-rating version of the UKU-Consumer Satisfaction Rating Scale.
    Ivarsson B; Malm U
    Nord J Psychiatry; 2007; 61(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 17523031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Nursing personnel attitudes prior to the introduction of informatic tools and contemporary vision of a hospital information system].
    Vereecke PJ
    Rech Soins Infirm; 1996 Sep; (46):83-93. PubMed ID: 16737037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Measuring effectiveness of electronic medical records systems: towards building a composite index for benchmarking hospitals.
    Otieno GO; Hinako T; Motohiro A; Daisuke K; Keiko N
    Int J Med Inform; 2008 Oct; 77(10):657-69. PubMed ID: 18313352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. What doctors want in Web portals.
    Internet Healthc Strateg; 2003 Sep; 5(9):5-7. PubMed ID: 14552046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Developing and testing a clinical information system evaluation tool: prioritizing modifications through end-user input.
    Smith JB; Lacey SR; Williams AR; Teasley SL; Olney A; Hunt C; Cox KS; Kemper C
    J Nurs Adm; 2011 Jun; 41(6):252-8. PubMed ID: 21610479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Satisfaction with web-based training in an integrated healthcare delivery network: do age, education, computer skills and attitudes matter?
    Atreja A; Mehta NB; Jain AK; Harris C; Ishwaran H; Avital M; Fishleder AJ
    BMC Med Educ; 2008 Oct; 8():48. PubMed ID: 18922178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. No sour notes. Five ways to hammer out harmony between your IS professionals and users.
    Joch A
    Healthc Inform; 1998 Oct; 15(10):91-2, 94, 96. PubMed ID: 10185034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Surveying for excellence in radiology.
    Leckie R; Rooks V; Embry R
    Adm Radiol; 1992 Aug; 11(8):34-5. PubMed ID: 10121760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The WAMI Rural Hospital Project. Part 5: Community perception of local health care services.
    Hart LG; Lishner DM; Amundson BA
    J Rural Health; 1991; 7(5):542-59. PubMed ID: 10117237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Development and initial evaluation of the Clinical Information Systems Success Model (CISSM).
    Garcia-Smith D; Effken JA
    Int J Med Inform; 2013 Jun; 82(6):539-52. PubMed ID: 23497819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A study of remote users' satisfaction with online services before and after procedural modifications.
    Weller AC
    Bull Med Libr Assoc; 1985 Oct; 73(4):352-7. PubMed ID: 4052674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. User acceptance of clinical information systems: a methodological approach to identify the key dimensions allowing a reliable evaluation framework.
    Despont-Gros C; Fabry P; Muller H; Geissbuhler A; Lovis C
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 2):1038-42. PubMed ID: 15360970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Systems failures.
    Cameron J
    Nurs Times; 1992 May 27-Jun 2; 88(22):19. PubMed ID: 1598291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hospital information systems: measuring end user computing satisfaction (EUCS).
    Aggelidis VP; Chatzoglou PD
    J Biomed Inform; 2012 Jun; 45(3):566-79. PubMed ID: 22426283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Determinants of Internet use as a preferred source of information on personal health.
    Lemire M; Paré G; Sicotte C; Harvey C
    Int J Med Inform; 2008 Nov; 77(11):723-34. PubMed ID: 18434246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Deepening the understanding of hospital patient satisfaction: fulfillment and equity effects.
    Swan JE; Sawyer JC; Van Matre JG; McGee GW
    J Health Care Mark; 1985; 5(3):7-18. PubMed ID: 10274620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.