These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1399619)

  • 1. Exact calculation of probabilities of false positives and false negatives for low background counting.
    Brodsky A
    Health Phys; 1992 Aug; 63(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 1399619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of eight decision rules for low-level radioactivity counting.
    Strom DJ; MacLellan JA
    Health Phys; 2001 Jul; 81(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 11414621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Poisson mixture model for measurements using counting.
    Miller G; Justus A; Vostrotin V; Dry D; Bertelli L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Mar; 138(4):363-75. PubMed ID: 19942624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Monte Carlo method for calculation of the characteristic limits decision threshold and detection limit in low-level radioactivity measurements.
    Ramebäck H; Persson L; Ekberg C; Vesterlund A; Bruggeman M
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2021 Dec; 178():109959. PubMed ID: 34601271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exact and approximate Bayesian estimation of net counting rates.
    Groer PG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 102(3):265-8. PubMed ID: 12430965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using biological data from field studies with multiple reference sites as a basis for environmental management: the risks for false positives and false negatives.
    Hanson N
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Mar; 92(3):610-9. PubMed ID: 21035245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Confidence Intervals for Asbestos Fiber Counts: Approximate Negative Binomial Distribution.
    Bartley D; Slaven J; Harper M
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2017 Mar; 61(2):237-247. PubMed ID: 28395351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Poisson-based detection limit and signal confidence intervals for few total counts.
    Alvarez JL
    Health Phys; 2007 Aug; 93(2):120-6. PubMed ID: 17622816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimum detectable activity when background is counted longer than the sample.
    Strom DJ; Stansbury PS
    Health Phys; 1992 Sep; 63(3):360-1. PubMed ID: 1644575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating false positives and negatives in brain networks.
    de Reus MA; van den Heuvel MP
    Neuroimage; 2013 Apr; 70():402-9. PubMed ID: 23296185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Zero effects in substance abuse programs. Avoiding false positives and false negatives in the evaluation of community-based programs.
    Rindskopf D; Saxe L
    Eval Rev; 1998 Feb; 22(1):78-94. PubMed ID: 10183302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A proposed method to determine the decision level for radioactivity measurements.
    Rigaud D
    Health Phys; 2003 Aug; 85(2):140-9. PubMed ID: 12938960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analyzing bioassay data using Bayesian methods--a primer.
    Miller G; Inkret WC; Schillaci ME; Martz HF; Little TT
    Health Phys; 2000 Jun; 78(6):598-613. PubMed ID: 10832919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trade-off between false positives and false negatives in the linkage analysis of complex traits.
    Todorov AA; Rao DC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(5):453-64. PubMed ID: 9358264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Balancing false positives and false negatives for the detection of differential expression in malignancies.
    De Smet F; Moreau Y; Engelen K; Timmerman D; Vergote I; De Moor B
    Br J Cancer; 2004 Sep; 91(6):1160-5. PubMed ID: 15354216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An evaluation of leucocyte analysis on the Coulter STKS.
    Robertson EP; Lai HW; Wei DC
    Clin Lab Haematol; 1992; 14(1):53-68. PubMed ID: 1600694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Calculating the probability of rare events: why settle for an approximation?
    Luft HS; Brown BW
    Health Serv Res; 1993 Oct; 28(4):419-39. PubMed ID: 8407336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The delta and epsilon errors in the assessment of cancer clinical trials.
    Staquet MJ; Rozencweig M; Von Hoff DD; Muggia FM
    Cancer Treat Rep; 1979; 63(11-12):1917-21. PubMed ID: 526924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Weighing harm in therapeutic decisions of smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis.
    Moreira J; Bisig B; Muwawenimana P; Basinga P; Bisoffi Z; Haegeman F; Kishore P; Van den Ende J
    Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(3):380-90. PubMed ID: 19224870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multichannel statistical analysis of low-level radioactivity in the presence of background counts.
    Lemay F
    Health Phys; 2012 Dec; 103(6):770-9. PubMed ID: 23111524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.