These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. [Presbyopia--the last major challenge in ocular surgery]. Potop V Oftalmologia; 2008; 52(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 19065925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [TREATMENTS FOR PRESBYOPIA]. Erdinest N; Morad Y; London N; Shmueli O; Lavy I Harefuah; 2022 Jul; 161(7):448-453. PubMed ID: 35833432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospects to regain the ability to accommodate. Weeber HA Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 Apr; 254(4):725-6. PubMed ID: 26887827 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Traditional methods for the treatment of presbyopia: spectacles, contact lenses, bifocal contact lenses. Callina T; Reynolds TP Ophthalmol Clin North Am; 2006 Mar; 19(1):25-33, v. PubMed ID: 16500526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Compensating presbyopia: a new physiological progressive lens (author's transl)]. Manent PJ; Pecheur J; Maille M; Claude R J Fr Ophtalmol; 1981; 4(11):757-61. PubMed ID: 7328271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pig lenses in a lens stretcher: implications for presbyopia treatment. Kammel R; Ackermann R; Mai T; Damm C; Nolte S Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Jun; 89(6):908-15. PubMed ID: 22561204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computer vision syndrome in presbyopia and beginning presbyopia: effects of spectacle lens type. Jaschinski W; König M; Mekontso TM; Ohlendorf A; Welscher M Clin Exp Optom; 2015 May; 98(3):228-33. PubMed ID: 25963113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Strehl ratios characterizing optical elements designed for presbyopia compensation. Petelczyc K; García JA; Bará S; Jaroszewicz Z; Kakarenko K; Kolodziejczyk A; Sypek M Opt Express; 2011 Apr; 19(9):8693-9. PubMed ID: 21643121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Quest for Spectacle Independence: A Comparison of Multifocal Intraocular Lens Implants and Pseudophakic Monovision for Patients with Presbyopia. Greenstein S; Pineda R Semin Ophthalmol; 2017; 32(1):111-115. PubMed ID: 27792408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Progress in the spectacle correction of presbyopia. Part 1: Design and development of progressive lenses. Meister DJ; Fisher SW Clin Exp Optom; 2008 May; 91(3):240-50. PubMed ID: 18279415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [EXPERIENCES IN THE PRESCRIPTION OF LENSES WITH CONTINUOUS CHANGE OF REFRACTION ACHIEVED BY VARIOUS OPTICAL SYSTEMS]. VESPER G Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1964 Mar; 144():240-6. PubMed ID: 14176403 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Polymer refilling of presbyopic human lenses in vitro restores the ability to undergo accommodative changes. Koopmans SA; Terwee T; Barkhof J; Haitjema HJ; Kooijman AC Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Jan; 44(1):250-7. PubMed ID: 12506082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the behavior of natural and refilled porcine lenses in a robotic lens stretcher. Reilly MA; Hamilton PD; Perry G; Ravi N Exp Eye Res; 2009 Mar; 88(3):483-94. PubMed ID: 19041865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]