These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1399909)
1. Evaluation of four membrane filter media in anaerobic-MF recovery of faecal coliforms from freshwater in Nigeria. Ogan MT J Appl Bacteriol; 1992 Aug; 73(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 1399909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Observations on the anaerobic membrane-filter technique for coliform counts in Nigerian surface waters. Ogan MT Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1989 Jun; 188(3-4):311-21. PubMed ID: 2757746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnitude of faecal contamination of rural community well waters in Nigeria and its relationship to well and water properties. Ogan MT Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1989 Dec; 189(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 2627253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of standard and modified M-FC, MacConkey, and Teepol media for membrane filtration counting of fecal coliforms in water. Grabow WO; Hilner CA; Coubrough P Appl Environ Microbiol; 1981 Aug; 42(2):192-9. PubMed ID: 7025755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of total and faecal coliforms as faecal indicator in eutrophicated surface water. Park JE; Ahn TS; Lee HJ; Lee YO Water Sci Technol; 2006; 54(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 17037151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of noncoliforms on coliform detection in potable groundwater: improved recovery with an anaerobic membrane filter technique. Franzblau SG; Hinnebusch BJ; Kelley LM; Sinclair NA Appl Environ Microbiol; 1984 Jul; 48(1):142-8. PubMed ID: 6383216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recovery of coliform bacteria from rural groundwater supplies using reduced oxygen concentrations during incubation. Shirey JJ; Bissonnette GK Can J Microbiol; 1997 Jun; 43(6):583-8. PubMed ID: 9289351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modification of M-FC medium by eliminating rosolic acid. Presswood WG; Strong DK Appl Environ Microbiol; 1978 Jul; 36(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 358922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative evaluation of modified m-FC and m-TEC media for membrane filter enumeration of Escherichia coli in water. Ciebin BW; Brodsky MH; Eddington R; Horsnell G; Choney A; Palmateer G; Ley A; Joshi R; Shears G Appl Environ Microbiol; 1995 Nov; 61(11):3940-2. PubMed ID: 8526507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Studies on microbial quality of filtered water in households of a university community in Nigeria. Alabi DA; Adesiyun AA J Hyg (Lond); 1986 Apr; 96(2):239-48. PubMed ID: 3517156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Incidence of Staphylococcus aureus, coliforms and antibiotic-resistant strains of Escherichia coli in rural water supplies in Port Harcourt. Antai SP J Appl Bacteriol; 1987 Apr; 62(4):371-5. PubMed ID: 3298188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Membrane filter procedure for enumerating the component genera of the coliform group in seawater. Dufour AP; Cabelli VJ Appl Microbiol; 1975 Jun; 29(6):826-33. PubMed ID: 1098575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Enumeration of heterotrophs, fecal coliforms and Escherichia coli in water: comparison of 3M Petrifilm plates with standard plating procedures. Schraft H; Watterworth LA J Microbiol Methods; 2005 Mar; 60(3):335-42. PubMed ID: 15649535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Suitability of the traditional microbial indicators and their enumerating methods in the assessment of fecal pollution of subtropical freshwater environments. Chao KK; Chao CC; Chao WL J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2003 Dec; 36(4):288-93. PubMed ID: 14723262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Identification of strains isolated as total and fecal coliforms and comparison of both groups as indicators of fecal pollution in tropical climates. Lavoie MC Can J Microbiol; 1983 Jun; 29(6):689-93. PubMed ID: 6883225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficiency of modified H2S test for detection of faecal contamination in water. Pathak SP; Gopal K Environ Monit Assess; 2005 Sep; 108(1-3):59-65. PubMed ID: 16160778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparative studies of fresh and seawater for the determination of total coliform and fecal coliform bacteria according to the European Economic Community guideline 76/160 (bathing water) by the use of the most-probable-number method with BRILA-MUG broth and differentiation according to the drinking water ordinance]. Havemeister G; Aleksic S; Bockemühl J; Heinemeyer EA; Müller HE; Von Pritzbuer E Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1991 May; 191(5-6):523-38. PubMed ID: 1883475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Membrane filtration differentiation of E. coli from coliforms in the examination of water. Mates A; Shaffer M J Appl Bacteriol; 1989 Sep; 67(3):343-6. PubMed ID: 2693426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of culturable fecal coliforms and Escherichia coli enumeration in freshwaters. Garcia-Armisen T; Prats J; Servais P Can J Microbiol; 2007 Jun; 53(6):798-801. PubMed ID: 17668040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Faecal coliform bacteria in Febros river (northwest Portugal): temporal variation, correlation with water parameters, and species identification. Cabral JP; Marques C Environ Monit Assess; 2006 Jul; 118(1-3):21-36. PubMed ID: 16897531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]