These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

46 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14002060)

  • 1. Effect of goalbox confinement during acquisition and extinction on a running response.
    WUNDERLICH RA; VELLUTINO FR; YOUNISS J
    Percept Mot Skills; 1963 Feb; 16():155-61. PubMed ID: 14002060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Increased resistance to extinction produced by post-reinforcement goalbox delay.
    Leeming FC; Pilley JW
    Psychol Rep; 1967 Oct; 21(2):521-6. PubMed ID: 6079257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of incentive magnitude on running speeds without competing responses in acquisition and extinction.
    MARX MH; BROWNSTEIN AJ
    J Exp Psychol; 1963 Feb; 65():182-9. PubMed ID: 13933223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perseveration of the partial reinforcement effect in extinction with rats over two phases of extinction and two stages of continuous reinforcement.
    Calef RS; Choban MC; Glenney KR; Calef RA; Schmitt E; Hinte S; Clegg M; Kraynok JE; Richards SD
    Psychol Rep; 2007 Feb; 100(1):101-7. PubMed ID: 17451011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Extinction of a running response as a function of reinforcement magnitude.
    Wilton RN
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1966 Aug; 18(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 5947477
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. EXPERIMENTAL EXTINCTION IN LEARNING AND MEMORY.
    BUNCH ME
    J Gen Psychol; 1963 Oct; 69():275-91. PubMed ID: 14057089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contingent delay versus noncontingent delay during acquisition and extinction.
    Clifford T; Birch D
    Psychol Rep; 1967 Feb; 20(1):207-12. PubMed ID: 6037792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Extinction in a runway as a function of acquisition level and reinforcement percentage.
    HILL WF; SPEAR NE
    J Exp Psychol; 1963 May; 65():495-500. PubMed ID: 13954552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The partial reinforcement extinction effect (PREE) in female Roman high- (RHA-I) and low-avoidance (RLA-I) rats.
    Gómez MA; de la Torre L; Callejas-Aguilera JE; Lerma-Cabrera JM; Rosas JM; Escarabajal MA; Agüero A; Tobeña A; Fernández-Teruel A; Torres C
    Behav Brain Res; 2008 Dec; 194(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 18692092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Extinction of food-reinforced instrumental behavior in Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica).
    Buriticá J; Ortega LA; Papini MR; Gutiérrez G
    J Comp Psychol; 2013 Feb; 127(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 22866774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Extinction learning, reconsolidation and the internal reinforcement hypothesis.
    Eisenhardt D; Menzel R
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2007 Feb; 87(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 17079171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of training methods, type of problem, and apparatus in acquisition and extinction.
    Towart EM; Smith WA
    Psychol Rep; 1966 Aug; 19(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 5942112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Delayed reward, delay-box confinement, and instrumental performance: a within-type design.
    Wike EL; Mellgren RL; Cour CA
    Psychol Rep; 1967 Dec; 21(3):857-62. PubMed ID: 6079653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. EFFECTS OF DELAY ON SUBSEQUENT RUNNING UNDER IMMEDIATE REINFORCEMENT.
    SGRO JA; WEINSTOCK S
    J Exp Psychol; 1963 Sep; 66():260-3. PubMed ID: 14054384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of reinforcement, reinforcer omission and extinction on a communicative response in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris).
    Bentosela M; Barrera G; Jakovcevic A; Elgier AM; Mustaca AE
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jul; 78(3):464-9. PubMed ID: 18450389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of magnitude of reinforcement on acquisition and extinction of a running response.
    ARMUS HL
    J Exp Psychol; 1959 Jul; 58(1):61-3. PubMed ID: 13664886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of intertrial reinforcement on the aftereffect of nonreinforcement and resistance to extinction.
    CAPALDI EJ; HART D; STANLEY LR
    J Exp Psychol; 1963 Jan; 65():70-4. PubMed ID: 14018385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Partial-reinforcement extinction effect following different amounts of training.
    BACON WE
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1962 Dec; 55():998-1003. PubMed ID: 13965983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance after reinforcement and nonreinforcement in a partial reinforcement situation.
    McCain G
    Psychol Rep; 1966 Oct; 19(2):402. PubMed ID: 5912800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. VARIABLES IN EXTINCTION FOLLOWING ACQUISITION WITH VICARIOUS REINFORCEMENT.
    MARSTON AR
    J Exp Psychol; 1964 Sep; 68():312-5. PubMed ID: 14215431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.