157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1401214)
1. New selective medium for isolating Clostridium difficile from faeces.
Aspinall ST; Hutchinson DN
J Clin Pathol; 1992 Sep; 45(9):812-4. PubMed ID: 1401214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Isolation of Clostridium difficile from faecal specimens--a comparison of chromID C. difficile agar and cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar.
Carson KC; Boseiwaqa LV; Thean SK; Foster NF; Riley TV
J Med Microbiol; 2013 Sep; 62(Pt 9):1423-1427. PubMed ID: 23579394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar (CCFA) and taurocholate-CCFA for recovery of Clostridium difficile during surveillance of hospitalized patients.
Bliss DZ; Johnson S; Clabots CR; Savik K; Gerding DN
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1997 Sep; 29(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 9350408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of cycloserine-cefoxitin fructose agar (CCFA), CCFA with horse blood and taurocholate, and cycloserine-cefoxitin mannitol broth with taurocholate and lysozyme for recovery of Clostridium difficile isolates from fecal samples.
Tyrrell KL; Citron DM; Leoncio ES; Merriam CV; Goldstein EJ
J Clin Microbiol; 2013 Sep; 51(9):3094-6. PubMed ID: 23804392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improvement of Clostridium difficile isolation by heat-shock and typing of the isolated strains by SDS-PAGE.
Lahn M; Tyler G; Däubener W; Hadding U
Eur J Epidemiol; 1993 May; 9(3):327-34. PubMed ID: 8405320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improved recovery of Clostridium difficile spores with the incorporation of synthetic taurocholate in cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar (CCFA).
Foster NF; Riley TV
Pathology; 2012 Jun; 44(4):354-6. PubMed ID: 22531346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improving culture media for the isolation of Clostridium difficile from compost.
Dharmasena M; Jiang X
Anaerobe; 2018 Jun; 51():1-7. PubMed ID: 29518533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Selective and differential medium for isolation of Clostridium difficile.
George WL; Sutter VL; Citron D; Finegold SM
J Clin Microbiol; 1979 Feb; 9(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 429542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Role of culture and toxin detection in laboratory testing for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea.
Peterson LR; Kelly PJ; Nordbrock HA
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1996 Apr; 15(4):330-6. PubMed ID: 8781886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of selective media for optimal recovery of Clostridium difficile from diarrhoeal stools.
Niyogi SK; Pal SC
Indian J Med Res; 1992 Jul; 95():181-3. PubMed ID: 1398806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of sodium taurocholate to enhance spore recovery on a medium selective for Clostridium difficile.
Wilson KH; Kennedy MJ; Fekety FR
J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Mar; 15(3):443-6. PubMed ID: 7076817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Non-selective and selective enrichment media for the recovery of Clostridium difficile from chopped beef.
Chai C; Lee KS; Lee D; Lee S; Oh SW
J Microbiol Methods; 2015 Feb; 109():20-4. PubMed ID: 25499549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparison of three Clostridium difficile culture media: interest of enhancing spore germination media?].
Rousseau C; Poilane I; Diakite F; Feghoul L; Cruaud P; Collignon A
Pathol Biol (Paris); 2010 Feb; 58(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 19892495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Investigating the effect of supplementation on Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile spore recovery in two solid agars.
Pickering DS; Vernon JJ; Freeman J; Wilcox MH; Chilton CH
Anaerobe; 2018 Apr; 50():38-43. PubMed ID: 29408598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laboratory detection of Clostridium difficile. A comparison of media and incubation systems.
Mundy LS; Shanholtzer CJ; Willard KE; Gerding DN; Peterson LR
Am J Clin Pathol; 1995 Jan; 103(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 7817945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of five cultural procedures for isolation of Clostridium difficile from stools.
Marler LM; Siders JA; Wolters LC; Pettigrew Y; Skitt BL; Allen SD
J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Feb; 30(2):514-6. PubMed ID: 1537928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar and cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose broth for recovery of Clostridium difficile from environmental sites.
Clabots CR; Bettin KM; Peterson LR; Gerding DN
J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Nov; 29(11):2633-5. PubMed ID: 1774277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of culture based methods for the isolation of Clostridium difficile from stool samples in a research setting.
Lister M; Stevenson E; Heeg D; Minton NP; Kuehne SA
Anaerobe; 2014 Aug; 28():226-9. PubMed ID: 25038491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of a selective enrichment broth to recover Clostridium difficile from stool swabs stored under different conditions.
Arroyo LG; Rousseau J; Willey BM; Low DE; Staempfli H; McGeer A; Weese JS
J Clin Microbiol; 2005 Oct; 43(10):5341-3. PubMed ID: 16208013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development of an optimized broth enrichment culture medium for the isolation of Clostridium difficile.
Connor MC; McGrath JW; McMullan G; Marks N; Fairley DJ
Anaerobe; 2018 Dec; 54():92-99. PubMed ID: 30118894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
