These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1401531)

  • 1. Relations among different measures of speech reception in subjects using a cochlear implant.
    Rabinowitz WM; Eddington DK; Delhorne LA; Cuneo PA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Oct; 92(4 Pt 1):1869-81. PubMed ID: 1401531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of channel-to-electrode mappings on speech reception with the ineraid cochlear implant.
    Rabinowitz WM; Eddington DK
    Ear Hear; 1995 Oct; 16(5):450-8. PubMed ID: 8654900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of adult Ineraid and Nucleus cochlear implant patients after 3.5 years of use.
    Tyler RS; Lowder MW; Parkinson AJ; Woodworth GG; Gantz BJ
    Audiology; 1995; 34(3):135-44. PubMed ID: 8561691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vowel and consonant recognition with the aid of a multichannel cochlear implant.
    Dorman MF; Dankowski K; McCandless G; Parkin JL; Smith L
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1991 Aug; 43(3):585-601. PubMed ID: 1775658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vowel and consonant identification tests can be used to compare performances in a multilingual group of cochlear implant patients.
    Pelizzone M; Boëx C; Montandon P
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1993; 55(6):341-6. PubMed ID: 8265119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of TIMIT sentence list equivalency with adult cochlear implant recipients.
    King SE; Firszt JB; Reeder RM; Holden LK; Strube M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 May; 23(5):313-31. PubMed ID: 22533975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults. A speech perception study.
    Santarelli R; De Filippi R; Genovese E; Arslan E
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 18259078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of speech recognition and localization performance in bilateral and unilateral cochlear implant users matched on duration of deafness and age at implantation.
    Dunn CC; Tyler RS; Oakley S; Gantz BJ; Noble W
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):352-9. PubMed ID: 18453885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory-visual speech recognition by hearing-impaired subjects: consonant recognition, sentence recognition, and auditory-visual integration.
    Grant KW; Walden BE; Seitz PF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 May; 103(5 Pt 1):2677-90. PubMed ID: 9604361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modeling open-set spoken word recognition in postlingually deafened adults after cochlear implantation: some preliminary results with the neighborhood activation model.
    Meyer TA; Frisch SA; Pisoni DB; Miyamoto RT; Svirsky MA
    Otol Neurotol; 2003 Jul; 24(4):612-20. PubMed ID: 12851554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Amplitude Modulation Detection and Speech Recognition in Late-Implanted Prelingually and Postlingually Deafened Cochlear Implant Users.
    De Ruiter AM; Debruyne JA; Chenault MN; Francart T; Brokx JP
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):557-66. PubMed ID: 25851075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A single-band envelope cue as a supplement to speechreading of segmentals: a comparison of auditory versus tactual presentation.
    Bratakos MS; Reed CM; Delhorne LA; Denesvich G
    Ear Hear; 2001 Jun; 22(3):225-35. PubMed ID: 11409858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of static and dynamic vowel cues by multichannel cochlear implant users.
    Kirk KI; Tye-Murray N; Hurtig RR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3487-98. PubMed ID: 1619125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating the function of phonetic perceptual phenomena within speech recognition: an examination of the perception of /d/-/t/ by adult cochlear implant users.
    Iverson P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Feb; 113(2):1056-64. PubMed ID: 12597198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Phoneme recognition by deaf individuals using the multichannel nucleus cochlear implant.
    Mülder HE; Van Olphen AF; Bosman A; Smoorenburg GF
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1992 Nov; 112(6):946-55. PubMed ID: 1481665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relating quality of life to outcomes and predictors in adult cochlear implant users: Are we measuring the right things?
    Moberly AC; Harris MS; Boyce L; Vasil K; Wucinich T; Pisoni DB; Baxter J; Ray C; Shafiro V
    Laryngoscope; 2018 Apr; 128(4):959-966. PubMed ID: 28776711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electrode discrimination and speech recognition in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects.
    Zwolan TA; Collins LM; Wakefield GH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Dec; 102(6):3673-85. PubMed ID: 9407659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditory consonant and word recognition skills of cochlear implant users.
    Tye-Murray N; Tyler RS
    Ear Hear; 1989 Oct; 10(5):292-8. PubMed ID: 2792582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.