These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1401559)
21. When a medical device harms rather than helps. Neubauer M; Grubel D RN; 1992 Jun; 55(6):55-6, 58, 60-1. PubMed ID: 1529215 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The importance and challenges of "mutual recognition". Merrill RA Seton Hall Law Rev; 1998; 29(2):736-55. PubMed ID: 10569829 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. FDA device approval regulations. Savage RA Hum Pathol; 1994 May; 25(5):548-9. PubMed ID: 8200653 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Primer on medical device regulation. Part III. Regulatory mechanisms and import/export regulation. Monsein LH Radiology; 1997 Oct; 205(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 9314954 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. License to maim: federal pre-emption and the Medical Device Amendments of 1976. Petrella ME Health Matrix Clevel; 1996; 6(2):349-89. PubMed ID: 10178392 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Managing equipment failures: nursing practice requirements for meeting the challenges of the Safe Medical Devices Act. Cuthrell P J Intraven Nurs; 1996; 19(5):264-8. PubMed ID: 9060352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. User problems and medical device recalls. Mosenkis R Med Instrum; 1986; 20(4):226. PubMed ID: 3762454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Who should protect the public? The Supreme Court and medical device regulation. Korobkin R N Engl J Med; 2007 Oct; 357(17):1680-1. PubMed ID: 17960010 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Is that product safe? How to guarantee the integrity of medical supplies and tell staff about recalls. Runy LA Hosp Health Netw; 2007 Aug; 81(8):6 p following 46, 2. PubMed ID: 17874819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The preemptive scope of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976. Sunshine PH Food Drug Law J; 1995; 50(1):191-212. PubMed ID: 10342991 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. US and European postmarket clinical data requirements. Donawa M Med Device Technol; 2005 Mar; 16(2):19-21. PubMed ID: 15828495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Vioxx, radiology, and the Food and Drug Administration. Pentecost MJ J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 May; 2(5):394-7. PubMed ID: 17411841 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Device tracking: user facility responsibilities. Shepherd N J Clin Eng; 1993; 18(5):441-52. PubMed ID: 10129809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Medical devices and the US Food and Drug Administration: regulating the tools of radiology. Henderson JA; Smith JJ J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jun; 2(6):504-10. PubMed ID: 17411867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Answering the bell again. Med Prod Sales; 1983 Mar; 14(3):50-2. PubMed ID: 10258846 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Overhaul US licensing process for devices, urges Institute of Medicine. Cohen D BMJ; 2011 Aug; 343():d4990. PubMed ID: 21810870 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The impact of FDA reform. Trunzo J Med Device Technol; 2003 Apr; 14(3):36-7. PubMed ID: 12789699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Medical device regulation: an introduction for the practicing physician. Maisel WH Ann Intern Med; 2004 Feb; 140(4):296-302. PubMed ID: 14970153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. How do regulatory agencies ensure the release of a safe medical device? Haggar B Clin Perform Qual Health Care; 1999; 7(2):100-3. PubMed ID: 10747561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]