These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14023994)

  • 1. On the discriminative control of concurrent responses: the relations among response frequency, latency, and topography in auditory generalization.
    CROSS DV; LANE HL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1962 Oct; 5(4):487-96. PubMed ID: 14023994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory generalization gradients for response latency in the monkey.
    Moody DB; Stebbins WC; Iglauer C
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1971 Jul; 16(1):105-11. PubMed ID: 5003971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. GENERALIZATION GRADIENTS FOLLOWING TWO-RESPONSE DISCRIMINATION TRAINING.
    RISLEY T
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1964 Mar; 7(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 14130105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A further study of stimulus generalization following three-stimulus discrimination training.
    THOMAS DR; WILLIAMS JL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1963 Apr; 6(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 13981054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Generalization gradients of inhibition following auditory discrimination learning.
    JENKINS HM; HARRISON RH
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1962 Oct; 5(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 14029015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stimulus generalization following extra-dimensional training in educationally subnormal (severely) children.
    Hogg J; Evans PL
    Br J Psychol; 1975 May; 66(2):211-24. PubMed ID: 1156743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual discrimination learning in mentally handicapped adults: comparative effects of two-choice and multiple-choice training methods on stimulus generalization performance.
    Griffiths P; Boggan J; Tutt G; Dickens P
    J Ment Defic Res; 1985 Dec; 29 ( Pt 4)():347-57. PubMed ID: 4093962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stimulus generalization of a positive conditioned reinforcer.
    THOMAS DR; WILLIAMS JL
    Science; 1963 Jul; 141(3576):172-3. PubMed ID: 13981055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Generalization and discrimination as a function of the S-D-S delta intensity difference.
    PIERREL R; SHERMAN JG
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1962 Jan; 5(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 14486511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of generalization functions and frame of reference effects in different training paradigms.
    Thomas DR; Lusky M; Morrison S
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Jun; 51(6):529-40. PubMed ID: 1620565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of different measures of response strength in the study of stimulus generalization.
    Thomas DR; Konick DS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1966 May; 9(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 5948922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Absolute and relative measures of dimensional contrast.
    Hinson JM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1988 Sep; 50(2):249-60. PubMed ID: 3193057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Discrimination and stimulus generalization of approach, of avoidance, and of approach and avoidance during conflict.
    HOFFMAN HS; FLESHLER M
    J Exp Psychol; 1963 Mar; 65():280-91. PubMed ID: 13963927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Response patterning during stimulus generalization in the rat.
    Crites RJ; Harris RT; Rosenquist H; Thomas DR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1967 Mar; 10(2):165-8. PubMed ID: 6032521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Task specificity in nonspecific transfer and in extradimensional stimulus generalization in pigeons.
    Rodgers JP; Thomas DR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1982 Oct; 8(4):301-12. PubMed ID: 7175443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stimulus generalization, discrimination learning, and peak shift in horses.
    Dougherty DM; Lewis P
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Jul; 56(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 1940765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of S+ and S- separation on gradient shifts in humans.
    Derenne A
    J Gen Psychol; 2006 Apr; 133(2):163-73. PubMed ID: 16705909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of age on acquisition and maintenance of a location discrimination in rats.
    Harrison JM
    Exp Aging Res; 1981; 7(4):467-76. PubMed ID: 7333340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Searching for nothing: placing zero on the temporal continuum.
    Pinto C; Salgado S
    Anim Cogn; 2023 Jul; 26(4):1209-1216. PubMed ID: 36971969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A role for stimulus generalization in conditional discrimination learning.
    Wilson PN; Pearce JM
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1989 Aug; 41(3):243-73. PubMed ID: 2798927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.