These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1402412)

  • 21. Quantifying the lumbar flexion-relaxation phenomenon: theory, normative data, and clinical applications.
    Neblett R; Mayer TG; Gatchel RJ; Keeley J; Proctor T; Anagnostis C
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(13):1435-46. PubMed ID: 12838103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Identification of the correct lumbar level using passive intersegmental motion testing.
    Chakraverty RC; Pynsent PB; Westwood A; Chakraverty JK
    Anaesthesia; 2007 Nov; 62(11):1121-5. PubMed ID: 17924892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effects of high and low loading forces on measured values of lumbar stiffness.
    Latimer J; Lee M; Adams RD
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1998; 21(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 9567234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Inter- and intra-examiner reliability of motion palpation for the thoracolumbar spine.
    Cashley MA
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1987 Oct; 10(5):265-6. PubMed ID: 3694066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The reliability of selected motion- and pain provocation tests for the sacroiliac joint.
    Robinson HS; Brox JI; Robinson R; Bjelland E; Solem S; Telje T
    Man Ther; 2007 Feb; 12(1):72-9. PubMed ID: 16843031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Interexaminer reliability of three methods of combining test results to determine side of sacral restriction, sacral base position, and innominate bone position.
    Tong HC; Heyman OG; Lado DA; Isser MM
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2006 Aug; 106(8):464-8. PubMed ID: 16943516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Objective manual assessment of lumbar posteroanterior stiffness is now possible.
    Chiradejnant A; Maher CG; Latimer J
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2003 Jan; 26(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 12532136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The role of experience in clinical accuracy.
    Mior SA; McGregor M; Schut B
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1990 Feb; 13(2):68-71. PubMed ID: 2307923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reliability of chiropractic methods commonly used to detect manipulable lesions in patients with chronic low-back pain.
    French SD; Green S; Forbes A
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2000 May; 23(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 10820295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessment of combined movements of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic and low back pain subjects using a three-dimensional electromagnetic tracking system.
    Barrett CJ; Singer KP; Day R
    Man Ther; 1999 May; 4(2):94-9. PubMed ID: 10509063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Intertester reliability and validity of motion assessments during lumbar spine accessory motion testing.
    Landel R; Kulig K; Fredericson M; Li B; Powers CM
    Phys Ther; 2008 Jan; 88(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 18029394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Functional assessment of the lumbar spine through the optoelectronic ZooMS system. Clinical application.
    Ciavarro GL; Andreoni G; Negrini S; Santambrogio GC
    Eura Medicophys; 2006 Jun; 42(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 16767063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mechanical low back pain: etiology and conservative management.
    Pustaver MR
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1994; 17(6):376-84. PubMed ID: 7964198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Reliability of the assessment of lumbar range of motion and maximal isometric strength in patients with chronic low back pain.
    Roussel NA; Truijen S; De Kerf I; Lambeets D; Nijs J; Stassijns G
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Apr; 89(4):788-91. PubMed ID: 18374015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Interexaminer reliability of lumbar segmental mobility tests.
    Johansson F
    Man Ther; 2006 Nov; 11(4):331-6. PubMed ID: 16844402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of pelvic skeletal asymmetry on trunk movement: three-dimensional analysis in healthy individuals versus patients with mechanical low back pain.
    Al-Eisa E; Egan D; Deluzio K; Wassersug R
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Feb; 31(3):E71-9. PubMed ID: 16449891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability for palpation of the cranial rhythmic impulse at the head and sacrum.
    Moran RW; Gibbons P
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2001; 24(3):183-90. PubMed ID: 11313614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reliability and concurrent validity of the BROM II for measuring lumbar mobility.
    Breum J; Wiberg J; Bolton JE
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1995 Oct; 18(8):497-502. PubMed ID: 8583171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. How to evaluate intraexaminer reliability using an interexaminer reliability study design.
    Haas M
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1995 Jan; 18(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 7706953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Interexaminer Reliability of Seated Motion Palpation for the Stiffest Spinal Site.
    Holt K; Russell D; Cooperstein R; Young M; Sherson M; Haavik H
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2018 Sep; 41(7):571-579. PubMed ID: 30449306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.