BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1402489)

  • 1. Changing terminology and screening recommendations in cervical cytology screening programs.
    Robertson DI; Srivannaboon S; Pairwuti S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1992 Jan; 75 Suppl 1():90-3. PubMed ID: 1402489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Four years of screening cervical smears of cervical lesions].
    Autillo-Touati A; Benmoura D; Palazzi D; Robaglia A; Tasso F; Blanc B; Seite R
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1992; 21(7):754-60. PubMed ID: 1469229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [An operative model: verification of the quality of the screening Pap test ].
    Montanari GR; Arnaud S; Berardengo E; Campione D; Cozzani C; Parisio F; Viberti L; Ghiringhello B
    Pathologica; 2001 Oct; 93(5):609-10. PubMed ID: 11725370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The pitfalls of cervical cancer screening.
    Sedlis A
    Contrib Gynecol Obstet; 1991; 18():103-14. PubMed ID: 1657521
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cervex-Brush and Cytobrush. Comparison of their ability to sample abnormal cells for cervical smears.
    Hutchinson M; Fertitta L; Goldbaum B; Hamza M; Vanerian S; Isenstein L
    J Reprod Med; 1991 Aug; 36(8):581-6. PubMed ID: 1941800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 1991 cervical screening recommendations: a working group report.
    Paul C; Bagshaw S; Bonita R; Durham G; Fitzgerald NW; Jones RW; Marshall B; McAvoy BR
    N Z Med J; 1991 Jul; 104(915):291-5. PubMed ID: 1906587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Significance of physical findings in diagnosis of cervical carcinoma.
    Moller KA; Fogh H; Moller PE; Strandbygard K
    Dan Med Bull; 1972 Jun; 19(4):122-7. PubMed ID: 5041568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cervical cytology screening of high-risk patients in Ondo General Hospital, Nigeria.
    Sogbanmu MO
    J Trop Med Hyg; 1977 May; 80(5):102-4. PubMed ID: 592451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for cervical cytology terminology.
    Herbert A; Bergeron C; Wiener H; Schenck U; Klinkhamer P; Bulten J; Arbyn M
    Cytopathology; 2007 Aug; 18(4):213-9. PubMed ID: 17635161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality control in cytopathology applied to screening for cervical carcinoma.
    Marsan C
    Pol J Pathol; 1995; 46(4):245-8. PubMed ID: 8713292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recommendations for cervical screening 1997. Members of the Working Party on Cervical Screening.
    N Z Med J; 1998 Mar; 111(1062):94-8. PubMed ID: 9577460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Achievable standards, benchmarks for reporting and criteria for evaluating cervical cytopathology.
    Dalla Palma P
    Cytopathology; 1997 Jun; 8(3):210. PubMed ID: 9202897
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Understanding cervical cytology.
    Beal MW
    Nurse Pract; 1987 Mar; 12(3):8-10, 15, 18-22. PubMed ID: 3561907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cervical mass screening in Norway--510,000 smears a year.
    Bjørge T; Gunbjørud AB; Langmark F; Skare GB; Thoresen SO
    Cancer Detect Prev; 1994; 18(6):463-70. PubMed ID: 7867019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
    Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of pipette and smear methods in population screenings for carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
    Klinken L; Koch F; Albrechtsen R
    Dan Med Bull; 1972 Jun; 19(4):138-40. PubMed ID: 5041571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cervical cancer screening programs: summary of the 1982. Canadian task force report.
    Can Med Assoc J; 1982 Oct; 127(7):581-9. PubMed ID: 7127225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of cervical smears at King Hussein Medical Centre, Jordan, over three and a half years.
    Malkawi SR; Abu Hazeem RM; Hajjat BM; Hajjiri FK
    East Mediterr Health J; 2004; 10(4-5):676-9. PubMed ID: 16335662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Bethesda system for the reporting of cervical/vaginal cytology.
    Oren A; Fernandes J
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1991 May; 91(5):476-9. PubMed ID: 2061103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. European guidelines on cervical screening.
    Smith JH; Desai MS
    Cytopathology; 2007 Aug; 18(4):211-2. PubMed ID: 17635160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.