These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1402489)

  • 1. Changing terminology and screening recommendations in cervical cytology screening programs.
    Robertson DI; Srivannaboon S; Pairwuti S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1992 Jan; 75 Suppl 1():90-3. PubMed ID: 1402489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Four years of screening cervical smears of cervical lesions].
    Autillo-Touati A; Benmoura D; Palazzi D; Robaglia A; Tasso F; Blanc B; Seite R
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1992; 21(7):754-60. PubMed ID: 1469229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [An operative model: verification of the quality of the screening Pap test ].
    Montanari GR; Arnaud S; Berardengo E; Campione D; Cozzani C; Parisio F; Viberti L; Ghiringhello B
    Pathologica; 2001 Oct; 93(5):609-10. PubMed ID: 11725370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The pitfalls of cervical cancer screening.
    Sedlis A
    Contrib Gynecol Obstet; 1991; 18():103-14. PubMed ID: 1657521
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cervex-Brush and Cytobrush. Comparison of their ability to sample abnormal cells for cervical smears.
    Hutchinson M; Fertitta L; Goldbaum B; Hamza M; Vanerian S; Isenstein L
    J Reprod Med; 1991 Aug; 36(8):581-6. PubMed ID: 1941800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 1991 cervical screening recommendations: a working group report.
    Paul C; Bagshaw S; Bonita R; Durham G; Fitzgerald NW; Jones RW; Marshall B; McAvoy BR
    N Z Med J; 1991 Jul; 104(915):291-5. PubMed ID: 1906587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Significance of physical findings in diagnosis of cervical carcinoma.
    Moller KA; Fogh H; Moller PE; Strandbygard K
    Dan Med Bull; 1972 Jun; 19(4):122-7. PubMed ID: 5041568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cervical cytology screening of high-risk patients in Ondo General Hospital, Nigeria.
    Sogbanmu MO
    J Trop Med Hyg; 1977 May; 80(5):102-4. PubMed ID: 592451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for cervical cytology terminology.
    Herbert A; Bergeron C; Wiener H; Schenck U; Klinkhamer P; Bulten J; Arbyn M
    Cytopathology; 2007 Aug; 18(4):213-9. PubMed ID: 17635161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality control in cytopathology applied to screening for cervical carcinoma.
    Marsan C
    Pol J Pathol; 1995; 46(4):245-8. PubMed ID: 8713292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recommendations for cervical screening 1997. Members of the Working Party on Cervical Screening.
    N Z Med J; 1998 Mar; 111(1062):94-8. PubMed ID: 9577460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Achievable standards, benchmarks for reporting and criteria for evaluating cervical cytopathology.
    Dalla Palma P
    Cytopathology; 1997 Jun; 8(3):210. PubMed ID: 9202897
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Understanding cervical cytology.
    Beal MW
    Nurse Pract; 1987 Mar; 12(3):8-10, 15, 18-22. PubMed ID: 3561907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cervical mass screening in Norway--510,000 smears a year.
    Bjørge T; Gunbjørud AB; Langmark F; Skare GB; Thoresen SO
    Cancer Detect Prev; 1994; 18(6):463-70. PubMed ID: 7867019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
    Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of pipette and smear methods in population screenings for carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
    Klinken L; Koch F; Albrechtsen R
    Dan Med Bull; 1972 Jun; 19(4):138-40. PubMed ID: 5041571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cervical cancer screening programs: summary of the 1982. Canadian task force report.
    Can Med Assoc J; 1982 Oct; 127(7):581-9. PubMed ID: 7127225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of cervical smears at King Hussein Medical Centre, Jordan, over three and a half years.
    Malkawi SR; Abu Hazeem RM; Hajjat BM; Hajjiri FK
    East Mediterr Health J; 2004; 10(4-5):676-9. PubMed ID: 16335662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Bethesda system for the reporting of cervical/vaginal cytology.
    Oren A; Fernandes J
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1991 May; 91(5):476-9. PubMed ID: 2061103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. European guidelines on cervical screening.
    Smith JH; Desai MS
    Cytopathology; 2007 Aug; 18(4):211-2. PubMed ID: 17635160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.