These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Operant conditioning of behavioral variability using a percentile reinforcement schedule. Machado A J Exp Anal Behav; 1989 Sep; 52(2):155-66. PubMed ID: 2794841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Choice with certain and uncertain reinforcers in an adjusting-delay procedure. Mazur JE J Exp Anal Behav; 1996 Jul; 66(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 8755700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Successive independence and behavioral contrast in a closed economy. White KG; Alsop B; McLean AP J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Sep; 58(2):313-23. PubMed ID: 1402604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Expectancies of reinforcer location and quality as cues for a conditional discrimination in pigeons. Williams DA; Butler MM; Overmier JB J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1990 Jan; 16(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 2303792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of stimulus orderability and reinforcement history on transitive responding in pigeons. Lazareva OF; Wasserman EA Behav Processes; 2006 May; 72(2):161-72. PubMed ID: 16460886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Separating the effects of response rate and reinforcement frequency in the rate-dependent effects of amphetamine and scopolamine on the schedule-controlled performance of rats and pigeons. MacPhail RC; Gollub LR J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1975 Aug; 194(2):332-42. PubMed ID: 1151762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Increasing the variability of response sequences in pigeons by adjusting the frequency of switching between two keys. Machado A J Exp Anal Behav; 1997 Jul; 68(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 9241860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Molar versus local reinforcement probability as determinants of stimulus value. Williams BA J Exp Anal Behav; 1993 Jan; 59(1):163-72. PubMed ID: 8433063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Resistance to change within heterogeneous response sequences. Reid AK J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Jul; 35(3):293-311. PubMed ID: 19594277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Molar function depends on molecular structure of behavior. Shimp CP; Fremouw T; Ingebritsen LM; Long KA J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1994 Jan; 20(1):96-107. PubMed ID: 8308495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Key-peck probability and topography in a concurrent variable-interval variable-interval schedule with food and water reinforcers. Ploog BO; Zeigler HP J Exp Anal Behav; 1997 Jan; 67(1):109-29. PubMed ID: 9037783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Information processing by pigeons (Columba livia): incentive as information. Shimp CP; Froehlich AL; Herbranson WT J Comp Psychol; 2007 Feb; 121(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 17324077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stimulus control of behavioral history. Freeman TJ; Lattal KA J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Jan; 57(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 1548448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of partial reinforcement and time between reinforced trials on terminal response rate in pigeon autoshaping. Gottlieb DA Behav Processes; 2006 Mar; 72(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 16413974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differential resurgence and response elimination. Doughty AH; da Silva SP; Lattal KA Behav Processes; 2007 Jun; 75(2):115-28. PubMed ID: 17395402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Learning by pigeons playing against tit-for-tat in an operant prisoner's dilemma. Sanabria F; Baker F; Rachlin H Learn Behav; 2003 Nov; 31(4):318-31. PubMed ID: 14733481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]