These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1402702)

  • 1. Similarity-scaling studies of dot-pattern classification and recognition.
    Shin HJ; Nosofsky RM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1992 Sep; 121(3):278-304. PubMed ID: 1402702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Central tendencies, extreme points, and prototype enhancement effects in ill-defined perceptual categorization.
    Palmeri TJ; Nosofsky RM
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Feb; 54(1):197-235. PubMed ID: 11216316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. False prototype enhancement effects in dot pattern categorization.
    Zaki SR; Nosofsky RM
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Apr; 32(3):390-8. PubMed ID: 15285123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Further tests of an exemplar-similarity approach to relating identification and categorization.
    Nosofsky RM
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Apr; 45(4):279-90. PubMed ID: 2710628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tests of an exemplar model for relating perceptual classification and recognition memory.
    Nosofsky RM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Feb; 17(1):3-27. PubMed ID: 1826320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Given versus induced category representations: use of prototype and exemplar information in classification.
    Medin DL; Altom MW; Murphy TD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1984 Jul; 10(3):333-52. PubMed ID: 6235306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distinguishing prototype-based and exemplar-based processes in dot-pattern category learning.
    Smith JD; Minda JP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):800-11. PubMed ID: 12109770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combining exemplar-based category representations and connectionist learning rules.
    Nosofsky RM; Kruschke JK; McKinley SC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 Mar; 18(2):211-33. PubMed ID: 1532819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prototype abstraction by monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
    Smith JD; Redford JS; Haas SM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 May; 137(2):390-401. PubMed ID: 18473665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exploring the psychological structure of transformational knowledge in visual and haptic intramodal conditions using multidimensional scaling.
    Do PT; Homa D
    Percept Mot Skills; 2012 Oct; 115(2):443-64. PubMed ID: 23265010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prototype-distortion category learning: a two-phase learning process across a distributed network.
    Little DM; Thulborn KR
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Apr; 60(3):233-43. PubMed ID: 16406637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of exemplar-based generalization and the abstraction of categorical information.
    Busemeyer JR; Dewey GI; Medin DL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1984 Oct; 10(4):638-48. PubMed ID: 6239005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exemplar-model account of categorization and recognition when training instances never repeat.
    Hu M; Nosofsky RM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Dec; 48(12):1947-1969. PubMed ID: 33764125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The modulating influence of category size on the classification of exception patterns.
    Homa D; Proulx MJ; Blair M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Mar; 61(3):425-43. PubMed ID: 17853225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparisons between exemplar similarity and mixed prototype models using a linearly separable category structure.
    Stanton RD; Nosofsky RM; Zaki SR
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Sep; 30(6):934-44. PubMed ID: 12450096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High-variability training does not enhance generalization in the prototype-distortion paradigm.
    Hu M; Nosofsky RM
    Mem Cognit; 2024 Jul; 52(5):1017-1032. PubMed ID: 38228994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prototypes in category learning: the effects of category size, category structure, and stimulus complexity.
    Minda JP; Smith JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 May; 27(3):775-99. PubMed ID: 11394680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stages of abstraction and exemplar memorization in pigeon category learning.
    Cook RG; Smith JD
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Dec; 17(12):1059-67. PubMed ID: 17201788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tests of an exemplar-memory model of classification learning in a high-dimensional natural-science category domain.
    Nosofsky RM; Sanders CA; McDaniel MA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Mar; 147(3):328-353. PubMed ID: 29058939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of manipulated category knowledge on prototype classification and recognition.
    Homa D; Goldhardt B; Burruel-Homa L; Smith JC
    Mem Cognit; 1993 Jul; 21(4):529-38. PubMed ID: 8350744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.