These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1402707)

  • 1. The picture superiority effect in categorization: visual or semantic?
    Job R; Rumiati R; Lotto L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 Sep; 18(5):1019-28. PubMed ID: 1402707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An enquiry into the process of categorization of pictures and words.
    Viswanathan M; Childers TL
    Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Feb; 96(1):267-87. PubMed ID: 12705535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual effects in picture and word categorization.
    Lotto L; Job R; Rumiati R
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Jul; 27(4):674-84. PubMed ID: 10479826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Categorizing chairs and naming pears: category differences in object processing as a function of task and priming.
    Lloyd-Jones TJ; Humphreys GW
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Sep; 25(5):606-24. PubMed ID: 9337580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The effect of visual similarity on picture categorization and identification].
    Matsukawa J
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1995 Feb; 65(6):437-45. PubMed ID: 7752566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The direction of hemispheric asymmetries for object categorization at different levels of abstraction depends on the task.
    Studer T; Hübner R
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Jul; 67(2):197-211. PubMed ID: 18308442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stimulus-driven or autonomous shift or attention?
    Hsieh S
    Percept Mot Skills; 1995 Jun; 80(3 Pt 2):1187-99. PubMed ID: 7478876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The locus and nature of semantic congruity in symbolic comparison: evidence from the Stroop effect.
    Shaki S; Algom D
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jan; 30(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 11958352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Crowded and sparse domains in object recognition: consequences for categorization and naming.
    Gale TM; Laws KR; Foley K
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Mar; 60(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 16377049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The picture superiority effect in associative recognition.
    Hockley WE
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Oct; 36(7):1351-9. PubMed ID: 18927048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Semantic processing of crowded stimuli?
    Huckauf A; Knops A; Nuerk HC; Willmes K
    Psychol Res; 2008 Nov; 72(6):648-56. PubMed ID: 18841386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attention to local form information can prevent access to semantic information.
    Murray JE; Jones C
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Apr; 55(2):609-25. PubMed ID: 12047062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of visual similarity in picture categorization.
    Snodgrass JG; McCullough B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1986 Jan; 12(1):147-54. PubMed ID: 2949047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Words, pictures, and priming: on semantic activation, conscious identification, and the automaticity of information processing.
    Carr TH; McCauley C; Sperber RD; Parmelee CM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Dec; 8(6):757-77. PubMed ID: 6218234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reexamining the Snodgrass and Corwin 1988 picture identification norms.
    Koch C; Abbey L; Schmidt S
    Percept Mot Skills; 1995 Dec; 81(3 Pt 1):763-9. PubMed ID: 8668433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Picture superiority in conceptual memory: dissociative effects of encoding and retrieval tasks.
    Vaidya CJ; Gabrieli JD
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Oct; 28(7):1165-72. PubMed ID: 11126939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An event-related potential investigation of the relationship between semantic and perceptual levels of representation.
    van Schie HT; Wijers AA; Kellenbach ML; Stowe LA
    Brain Lang; 2003 Aug; 86(2):300-25. PubMed ID: 12921770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hemispheric differences in the processing of pictures of typical and atypical semantic category members.
    Vitkovitch M; Underwood G
    Cortex; 1991 Sep; 27(3):475-80. PubMed ID: 1743043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Graphemic and semantic similarity effects in the picture-word interference task.
    Rayner K; Springer CJ
    Br J Psychol; 1986 May; 77 ( Pt 2)():207-22. PubMed ID: 3730727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanisms for precuing superiority in visual recognition.
    Stolldorf DE; Redding GM; Manelis LM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Feb; 8(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 6460085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.